Literature DB >> 20582538

Effect of retinal and/or extra-retinal information on age in memory-guided saccades.

M R Burke1, J B Clarke, J Hedley.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether the addition of retinal or extra-retinal information could be used to improve memory-guided saccadic performance in healthy participants. Furthermore, we included two age groups in our study; healthy young adult subjects (mean age 20 years) and healthy middle-aged adult subjects (mean age 52 years). All subjects performed a novel task that incorporated a Go/NoGo task with a memory-guided saccade paradigm to investigate whether extra-retinal information (making a saccade towards the visible target) or retinal (a visible frame-of-reference) has any affect on the accuracy or variability of the response. We found all subjects made slight hypometric responses to the memory-guided targets. Both younger and middle-aged subjects revealed an increase in accuracy in the Go task compared with the NoGo task and the framed condition compared to the frameless condition, respectively. The frame also revealed a significant decrease in variability in the memory-guided saccades. A positive correlation in errors between the 1st and 2nd saccade in the Go task was revealed for all subjects; however, the older subjects revealed a greater correlation than younger subjects. The results presented indicate that younger and middle-aged perform highly similar patterns of errors during eye movements to remembered locations. However, middle-aged subjects show a greater tendency to use extra-retinal and retinal feedback to guide the response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20582538     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2335-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Visual distraction, working memory, and aging.

Authors:  R West
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Age-related differences in the control of spatial aiming movements.

Authors:  N L Goggin; H J Meeuwsen
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Effects of eye position on estimates of eye displacement for spatial updating.

Authors:  Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Effects of age on latency and error generation in internally mediated saccades.

Authors:  Larry A Abel; Jacinta Douglas
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Multiple memory-guided saccades: movement memory improves the accuracy of memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Silvia Colnaghi; Giorgio Beltrami; Andrea Cortese; Wolfgang H Zangemeister; Vittorio Cosi; Maurizio Versino
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Optimal sensorimotor control in eye movement sequences.

Authors:  Jérôme Munuera; Pierre Morel; Jean-René Duhamel; Sophie Deneve
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Age diminishes performance on an antisaccade eye movement task.

Authors:  A Olincy; R G Ross; D A Youngd; R Freedman
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  The spatial signal for saccadic eye movements emphasizes visual boundaries.

Authors:  J M Findlay; D Brogan; M G Wenban-Smith
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06

9.  Saccades are spatially, not retinocentrically, coded.

Authors:  L E Mays; D L Sparks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Touch responses made to remembered and visual target locations in the dark: a human psychophysical study.

Authors:  M R Burke; K L Grieve
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  The brain uses efference copy information to optimise spatial memory.

Authors:  C C Gonzalez; M R Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.