Literature DB >> 11160517

The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination.

J F Soechting1, K C Engel, M Flanders.   

Abstract

A moving background alters the perceived direction of target motion (the Duncker illusion). To test whether this illusion also affects pointing movements to remembered/extrapolated target locations, we constructed a display in which a target moved in a straight line and disappeared behind a band of moving random dots. Subjects were required to touch the spot where the target would emerge from the occlusion. The four directions of random-dot motion induced pointing errors that were predictable from the Duncker illusion. Because it has been previously established that saccadic direction is influenced by this illusion, gaze was subsequently recorded in a second series of experiments while subjects performed the pointing task and a similar task with eye-tracking only. In the pointing task, subjects typically saccaded to the lower border of the occlusion zone as soon as the target disappeared and then tried to maintain fixation at that spot. However, it was particularly obvious in the eye-tracking-only condition that horizontally moving random dots generally evoked an appreciable ocular following response, altering the gaze direction. Hand-pointing errors were related to the saccadic gaze error but were more highly correlated with final gaze errors (resulting from the initial saccade and the subsequent ocular following response). The results suggest a model of limb control in which gaze position can provide the target signal for limb movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11160517     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interception of targets using brief directional cues.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Planning and drawing complex shapes.

Authors:  Martha Flanders; Leigh A Mrotek; C C A M Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manual tracking in three dimensions.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; C C A M Gielen; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Paolo Bernardis; Paul Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Target selection in eye-hand coordination: Do we reach to where we look or do we look to where we reach?

Authors:  Annette Horstmann; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target.

Authors:  Philipp Kreyenmeier; Jolande Fooken; Miriam Spering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rhesus monkeys behave as if they perceive the Duncker Illusion.

Authors:  A Z Zivotofsky; M E Goldberg; K D Powell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.