Literature DB >> 23067117

Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory.

David E Anderson1, Edward K Vogel1, Edward Awh1.   

Abstract

Perceptual grouping can lead observers to perceive a multielement scene as a smaller number of hierarchical units. Past work has shown that grouping enables more elements to be stored in visual working memory (WM). Although this may appear to contradict so-called discrete resource models that argue for fixed item limits in WM storage, it is also possible that grouping reduces the effective number of "items" in the display. To test this hypothesis, we examined how mnemonic resolution declined as the number of items to be stored increased. Discrete resource models predict that precision will reach a stable plateau at relatively early set sizes, because no further items can be stored once putative item limits are exceeded. Thus, we examined whether the precision by set size function was bilinear when storage was enhanced via perceptual grouping. In line with the hypothesis that each perceptual group counted as a single "item," precision still reached a clear plateau at a set size determined by the number of stored groups. Moreover, the maximum number of elements stored was doubled, and electrophysiological measures showed that selection and storage-related neural responses were the same for a single element and a multielement perceptual group. Thus, perceptual grouping allows more elements to be held in working memory while storage is still constrained by a discrete item limit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23067117      PMCID: PMC4068940          DOI: 10.1037/a0030094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  34 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Perceptual completion and object-based representations in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Peter Walker; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

3.  Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: a logical sequel to Miller (1956).

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Zhijian Chen; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-09

4.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings.

Authors:  J T Enns; R A Rensink
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search.

Authors:  J T Enns; R A Rensink
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Trafton Drew; Daniel Klee; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Shaun P Vecera; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03
View more
  11 in total

1.  Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Induced α rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision.

Authors:  David E Anderson; John T Serences; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  "Plateau"-related summary statistics are uninformative for comparing working memory models.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Contralateral delay activity tracks the influence of Gestalt grouping principles on active visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Dwight J Peterson; Filiz Gözenman; Hector Arciniega; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory.

Authors:  Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

7.  Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-09

9.  For whom the bell tolls: periodic reactivation of sensory cortex in the gamma band as a substrate of visual working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Marieke Karlijn Van Vugt; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Modulation of alpha power at encoding and retrieval tracks the precision of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  E Poliakov; M G Stokes; M W Woolrich; D Mantini; D E Astle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.