Literature DB >> 15327636

Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: a logical sequel to Miller (1956).

Nelson Cowan1, Zhijian Chen, Jeffrey N Rouder.   

Abstract

We assessed a hypothesis that working memory capacity should include a constant number of separate mental units, or chunks (cf. Miller, 1956). Because of the practical difficulty of measuring chunks, this hypothesis has not been tested previously, despite wide attention to Miller's article. We used a training procedure to manipulate the strength of associations between pairs of words to be included in an immediate serial-recall task. Although the amount of training on associations clearly increased the availability of two-item chunks and therefore the number of items correct in list recall, the number of total chunks recalled (singletons plus two-word chunks) appeared to remain approximately constant across association strengths, supporting a hypothesis of constant capacity.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15327636     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00732.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  29 in total

1.  Promoting the experimental dialogue between working memory and chunking: Behavioral data and simulation.

Authors:  Sophie Portrat; Alessandro Guida; Thierry Phénix; Benoît Lemaire
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward Vogel; Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  How does running memory span work?

Authors:  Michael Bunting; Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis.

Authors:  Graeme S Halford; Nelson Cowan; Glenda Andrews
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Conceptual knowledge increases infants' memory capacity.

Authors:  Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

10.  Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.