Literature DB >> 23066318

High-definition colonoscopy with i-Scan: better diagnosis for small polyps and flat adenomas.

Pier Alberto Testoni1, Chiara Notaristefano, Cristian Vailati, Milena Di Leo, Edi Viale.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate if high-definition (HD) colonoscope with i-Scan gave a higher detection rate of mucosal lesions vs standard white-light instruments.
METHODS: Data were collected from the computerized database of the endoscopy unit of our tertiary referral center. We retrospectively analyzed 1101 consecutive colonoscopies that were performed over 1 year with standard white-light (n = 849) or HD+ with i-Scan (n = 252) instruments by four endoscopists, in an outpatient setting. Colonoscopy records included patients' main details and family history for colorectal cancer, indication for colonoscopy (screening, diagnostic or surveillance), type of instrument used (standard white-light or HD+ plus i-Scan), name of endoscopist and bowel preparation. Records for each procedure included whether the cecum was reached or not and the reason for failure, complications during or immediately after the procedure, and number, size, location and characteristics of the lesions. Polyps or protruding lesions were defined as sessile or pedunculated, and nonprotruding lesions were defined according to Paris classification. For each lesion, histological diagnosis was recorded.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and forty-nine colonoscopies were carried with the standard white-light video colonoscope and 252 with the HD+ plus i-Scan video colonoscope. The four endoscopists did 264, 300, 276 and 261 procedures, respectively; 21.6%, 24.0%, 21.7% and 24.1% of them with the HD+ plus i-Scan technique. There were no significant differences between the four endoscopists in either the number of procedures done or the proportions of each imaging technique used. Both techniques detected one or more mucosal lesions in 522/1101 procedures (47.4%). The overall number of lesions recognized was 1266; 645 in the right colon and 621 in the left. A significantly higher number of colonoscopies recognized lesions in the HD+ plus i-Scan mode (171/252 = 67.9%) than with the standard white-light technique (408/849 = 48.1%) (P < 0.0001). HD+ with i-Scan colonoscopies identified more lesions than standard white-light imaging (459/252 and 807/849, P < 0.0001), in the right or left colon (mean ± SD, 1.62 ± 1.36 vs. 1.33 ± 0.73, P < 0.003 and 1.55 ± 0.98 vs. 1.17 ± 0.93, P = 0.033), more lesions < 10 mm (P < 0.0001) or nonprotruding (P < 0.022), and flat polyps (P = 0.04). The cumulative mean number of lesions per procedure detected by the four endoscopists was significantly higher with HD+ with i-Scan than with standard white-light imaging (1.82 ± 2.89 vs. 0.95 ± 1.35, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: HD imaging with i-Scan during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy significantly increased the detection of colonic mucosal lesions, particularly small and nonprotruding polyps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection rate; Colonic polyps; Colonoscopy; Contrast enhancement; High-definition+ with i-Scan colonoscopy; Nonprotruding lesions; Surface enhancement; Tone enhancement; White-light colonoscopy; Withdrawal time

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066318      PMCID: PMC3468856          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  54 in total

1.  Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shawn C Chen; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  S Bensen; L A Mott; B Dain; R Rothstein; J Baron
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum.

Authors:  Shin-ei Kudo; Hiroshi Kashida
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Zhongliang Chen; Deanna M Rothwell; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.

Authors:  D Heresbach; T Barrioz; M G Lapalus; D Coumaros; P Bauret; P Potier; D Sautereau; C Boustière; J C Grimaud; C Barthélémy; J Sée; I Serraj; P N D'Halluin; B Branger; T Ponchon
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Takuya Inoue; Mitsuyuki Murano; Naoko Murano; Takanori Kuramoto; Ken Kawakami; Yosuke Abe; Eijiro Morita; Ken Toshina; Hideo Hoshiro; Yutaro Egashira; Eiji Umegaki; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-24       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?

Authors:  A Adler; H Pohl; I S Papanikolaou; H Abou-Rebyeh; G Schachschal; W Veltzke-Schlieker; A C Khalifa; E Setka; M Koch; B Wiedenmann; T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; David G Weiss; William V Harford; Dennis J Ahnen; Dawn Provenzale; Stephen J Sontag; Thomas G Schnell; Gregorio Chejfec; Donald R Campbell; Jayashri Kidao; John H Bond; Douglas B Nelson; George Triadafilopoulos; Francisco C Ramirez; Judith F Collins; Tiina K Johnston; Kenneth R McQuaid; Harinder Garewal; Richard E Sampliner; Romeo Esquivel; Douglas Robertson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Michael P Chase; Heiko Pohl; Gale S Fiarman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Claire C Helbig
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic tools for the diagnosis and evaluation of celiac disease.

Authors:  Gianluca Ianiro; Antonio Gasbarrini; Giovanni Cammarota
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Advanced endoscopic imaging to improve adenoma detection.

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Andreas Nägel; Andrea Buda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 3.  Accumulation of aberrant DNA methylation during colorectal cancer development.

Authors:  Eiji Sakai; Atsushi Nakajima; Atsushi Kaneda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Clinical, endoscopic and pathological characteristics of colorectal polyps in elderly patients: Single-center experience.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Heng Zhang; Shengbin Sun; Manling Huang; Jing Liu; Dan Xu; Min Song; Chenming Sun; Hui Li; Dan Zheng; Yan Fan; Yusheng Liao; Ping Wang; Jie Wu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Detection and characterization of colorectal polyps using high-definition white light and i-Scan: Evidence-based consensus recommendations using a modified Delphi process.

Authors:  Pradeep Bhandari; Sreedhari Thayalasekaran; Ralf Keisslich; Raf Bisschops; Arthur Hoffmann; Rehan Haidry; Jose Esteban; Bartolomé López Viedma; Elina Godzhello; Majid Almadi; Helmut Neumann; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  High Definition Colonoscopy Combined with i-SCAN Imaging Technology Is Superior in the Detection of Adenomas and Advanced Lesions Compared to High Definition Colonoscopy Alone.

Authors:  Erik A Bowman; Patrick R Pfau; Arnab Mitra; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal; Benjamin S Hall; Mark E Benson
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2015-06-18

7.  Increased Detection of Colorectal Polyps in Screening Colonoscopy Using High Definition i-SCAN Compared with Standard White Light.

Authors:  Woo Jung Kim; Sang Young Park; Iksoo Park; Wook Jin Lee; Jaechan Park; Nuri Chon; Tak Geun Oh; Kwang Hyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 8.  British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum.

Authors:  James E East; Wendy S Atkin; Adrian C Bateman; Susan K Clark; Sunil Dolwani; Shara N Ket; Simon J Leedham; Perminder S Phull; Matt D Rutter; Neil A Shepherd; Ian Tomlinson; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Advanced Endoscopic Imaging in Colonic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Timo Rath; Nadine Morgenstern; Francesco Vitali; Raja Atreya; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-01-21

10.  Efficacy of i-Scan Imaging for the Detection and Diagnosis of Early Gastric Carcinomas.

Authors:  Junichi Nishimura; Jun Nishikawa; Munetaka Nakamura; Atsushi Goto; Kouichi Hamabe; Shinichi Hashimoto; Takeshi Okamoto; Masato Suenaga; Yusuke Fujita; Yoshihiko Hamamoto; Isao Sakaida
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.