Literature DB >> 25789092

Advanced endoscopic imaging to improve adenoma detection.

Helmut Neumann1, Andreas Nägel1, Andrea Buda1.   

Abstract

Advanced endoscopic imaging is revolutionizing our way on how to diagnose and treat colorectal lesions. Within recent years a variety of modern endoscopic imaging techniques was introduced to improve adenoma detection rates. Those include high-definition imaging, dye-less chromoendoscopy techniques and novel, highly flexible endoscopes, some of them equipped with balloons or multiple lenses in order to improve adenoma detection rates. In this review we will focus on the newest developments in the field of colonoscopic imaging to improve adenoma detection rates. Described techniques include high-definition imaging, optical chromoendoscopy techniques, virtual chromoendoscopy techniques, the Third Eye Retroscope and other retroviewing devices, the G-EYE endoscope and the Full Spectrum Endoscopy-system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3rd Eye; Advanced endoscopic imaging; Chromoendoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement; Full Spectrum Endoscopy-system; G-Eye; I-scan; Narrow band imaging; Polyps

Year:  2015        PMID: 25789092      PMCID: PMC4360440          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  26 in total

1.  A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; H David Watts; Jack Higgins; Jacques Van Dam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Present and future perspectives of virtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan and optical enhancement technology.

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; C Mel Wilcox; Klaus Mönkemüller
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.559

3.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.

Authors:  Daniel C DeMarco; Elizabeth Odstrcil; Luis F Lara; David Bass; Chase Herdman; Timothy Kinney; Kapil Gupta; Leon Wolf; Thomas Dewar; Thomas M Deas; Manoj K Mehta; M Badar Anwer; Randall Pellish; J Kent Hamilton; Daniel Polter; K Gautham Reddy; Ira Hanan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  Su Jin Chung; Donghee Kim; Ji Hyun Song; Min Jung Park; Young Sun Kim; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; In Sung Song
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Aleksandar Nagorni; Goran Bjelakovic; Bratislav Petrovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

7.  A prospective randomized study on computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of small colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Roo Joo; Sung Won Jung; Hyun Phil Shin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner; Muhammad W Shahid; Michael G Heckman; Rebecca B McNeil; Patrick Cleveland; Kanwar R Gill; Anthony Schore; Marwan Ghabril; Massimo Raimondo; Seth A Gross; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection.

Authors:  Carol A Burke; Anuja G Choure; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Rocio Lopez
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Endoscopists with low adenoma detection rates benefit from high-definition endoscopy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Martha Britto-Arias; Irina Gessl; Georg Heinze; Petra Salzl; Daniela Sallinger; Michael Trauner; Werner Weiss; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A guide to multimodal endoscopy imaging for gastrointestinal malignancy - an early indicator.

Authors:  Arthur Hoffman; Henrik Manner; Johannes W Rey; Ralf Kiesslich
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Colonoscopy: Advanced and Emerging Techniques-A Review of Colonoscopic Approaches to Colorectal Conditions.

Authors:  Anjali S Kumar; Jennifer Kim Lee
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

3.  Efficacy of image enhanced endoscopy for colorectal polyps: Are we ready for prime time?

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Peter R Galle
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

4.  Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Peel Jung; Su B Park; Hyung W Kim; Dae H Kang; Cheol W Choi; Su J Kim; Hyeong S Nam; Dae G Ryu; Joung B Hong; Dong J Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.