Literature DB >> 30083337

Detection and characterization of colorectal polyps using high-definition white light and i-Scan: Evidence-based consensus recommendations using a modified Delphi process.

Pradeep Bhandari1, Sreedhari Thayalasekaran1, Ralf Keisslich2, Raf Bisschops3, Arthur Hoffmann2, Rehan Haidry4, Jose Esteban5, Bartolomé López Viedma6, Elina Godzhello7, Majid Almadi8, Helmut Neumann9, Silvia Sanduleanu10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: i-Scan is an image enhancement modality, which provides enhanced views of mucosal structures and vascular patterns.
METHODS: A modified Delphi process was used to develop a series of evidence-based statements on the role of high-definition white light (HDWL) and i-Scan for the detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms. Each statement was voted to achieve consensus (i.e. >80% agreement).
RESULTS: Seven proposed statements achieved consensus: (1) HDWL is recommended rather than standard definition (SD) for detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms; (2) HDWL colonoscopy with i-Scan improves polyp and adenoma detection rates when compared with SD colonoscopy; (3) HDWL + i-Scan is superior to HDWL alone for the optical diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms; (4) HDWL + i-Scan in expert hands meets American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) in the Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive neoplasms; (5) HDWL + i-Scan in non-expert hands does not meet ASGE PIVI standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive neoplasms; (6) optical diagnosis of polyps with i-Scan has a learning curve and needs systematic training; and (7) the performance of i-Scan for the in vivo diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms is similar to Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy (FICE).
CONCLUSIONS: Seven proposed statements on the use of HDWL and i-Scan for the detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms achieved consensus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colon; colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasm; colorectal polyp; endoscopic diagnosis; i-Scan; image-enhanced endoscopy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30083337      PMCID: PMC6068779          DOI: 10.1177/2050640618764531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  34 in total

Review 1.  The use of consensus methods and expert panels in pharmacoeconomic studies. Practical applications and methodological shortcomings.

Authors:  C Evans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Look, remove, and discard: can narrow-band imaging replace histopathology for small colorectal polyps? It is time to push the button!

Authors:  James E East; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linda K Wanders; James E East; Sanne E Uitentuis; Mariska M G Leeflang; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Narrow-band imaging versus I-Scan for the real-time histological prediction of diminutive colonic polyps: a prospective comparative study by using the simple unified endoscopic classification.

Authors:  Chang Kyun Lee; Suck-Ho Lee; Young Hwangbo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Han-Mo Chiu; Chi-Yang Chang; Chien-Chuan Chen; Yi-Chia Lee; Ming-Shiang Wu; Jaw-Town Lin; Chia-Tung Shun; Hsiu-Po Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Accuracy of i-Scan for Optical Diagnosis of Colonic Polyps: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chuan-Guo Guo; Rui Ji; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics.

Authors:  Sarah K McGill; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis; Roy M Soetikno; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Electronic chromo-endoscopy: technical details and a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Partha Pal; Aniruddha Pratap Singh; Navya D Kanuri; Rupa Banerjee
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

2.  Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Aziz; Zohaib Ahmed; Hossein Haghbin; Asad Pervez; Hemant Goyal; Faisal Kamal; Abdallah Kobeissy; Ali Nawras; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel C L Smith; Keith Siau; Rosanna Cannatelli; Giulio Antonelli; Uday N Shivaji; Subrata Ghosh; John R Saltzman; Cesare Hassan; Marietta Iacucci
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.