Literature DB >> 23064548

[Diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: Clinical value of different imaging methods].

H Thiele1, R Dörr, M Gutberlet.   

Abstract

This continuing medical education (CME) article describes the different non-invasive imaging methods with the exception of positron emission tomography for ischemia and viability testing. While stress methods, such as myocardial scintigraphy, stress echo or stress magnetic resonance imaging can detect the functional relevance of coronary artery stenosis, multislice computed tomography allows the visualization of the coronary anatomy and potential stenoses. Recently developed hybrid imaging allows the coronary anatomy and simultaneous functional testing of ischemia to be depicted. The different imaging methods for ischemia and viability testing are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23064548     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-012-3688-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  59 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  [Radionuclides--reasons and and teaching].

Authors:  A Bockisch; F Grünwald; J Kotzerke
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.379

3.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner; Robert Goetti; André Plass; Monika Wieser; Hans Scheffel; Christophe Wyss; Paul Stolzmann; Olivio Donati; Johannes Schnabl; Volkmar Falk; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  K E Fleischmann; M G Hunink; K M Kuntz; P S Douglas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors:  Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  E Nagel; H B Lehmkuhl; W Bocksch; C Klein; U Vogel; E Frantz; A Ellmer; S Dreysse; E Fleck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence.

Authors:  S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: from imaging to diagnosis].

Authors:  M Gutberlet
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Diagnosis and therapy of chronic myocardial ischemia. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  S de Waha; I Eitel; S Desch; G Fuernau; P Lurz; G Schuler; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  [Computed tomography in patients with chronic stable angina : Fractional flow reserve measurement].

Authors:  M Renker; U J Schoepf; T Becher; N Krampulz; W Kim; A Rolf; H Möllmann; C W Hamm; T Henzler; M Borggrefe; I Akin; S Baumann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.443

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.