Literature DB >> 15052249

Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Leslee J Shaw1, Ami E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15052249     DOI： 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2003.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  105 in total

1.  Predicting cardiac events with Tl201 dipyridamole myocardial scintigraphy in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Mauro Feola; Alberto Biggi; Flavio Ribichini; Alba Rovere; Antonello Vado; Gianfranco Camuzzini; Eugenio Uslenghi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Effect of knowledge of serum enzyme concentrations on doctors' interpretation of electrocardiographic manifestations in suspected myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T Gjørup; H Kelbaek; L Stenbygård; F Sørensen; J Godtfredsen; A M Jensen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-01-04

3.  Effects of long-term treatment with 120 mg of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate and 60 mg of sustained-release nifedipine on myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  B Stegaru; R Loose; H Keller; J Buss; E Wetzel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-03-25       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Prognostic value of dobutamine stress technetium-99m-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: stratification of a high-risk population.

Authors:  D A Calnon; P D McGrath; A L Doss; F E Harrell; D D Watson; G A Beller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Effective risk stratification using exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in women: gender-related differences in prognostic nuclear testing.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; C N Bairey; I Cohen; A Cabico; J Friedman; G Germano; K F Van Train; G A Diamond
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman; Hosen Kiat; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prognostic value of stress-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Kroll; W Farah; G R McKendall; S E Reinert; L L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  High reproducibility of myocardial perfusion defects in patients undergoing serial exercise thallium-201 tomography.

Authors:  J J Mahmarian; L A Moyé; M S Verani; M F Bloom; C M Pratt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease--the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction].

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Leslee J Shaw; Robert C Hendel; D Douglas Miller; Robert O Bonow; Daniel S Berman; Gary V Heller; Jennifer H Mieres; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Daniel S Berman; Robert O Bonow; Jean M Cacciabaudo; Gary V Heller; Robert C Hendel; Maria C Kiess; D Douglas Miller; Donna M Polk; Leslee J Shaw; Paola E Smanio; Mary N Walsh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence.

Authors:  S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236
View more
  194 in total

1.  A combined static-dynamic single-dose imaging protocol to compare quantitative dynamic SPECT with static conventional SPECT.

Authors:  Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of CT coronary angiography: focus on obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease and on the presence of left main disease.

Authors:  E Maffei; S Seitun; C Martini; A Aldrovandi; T Arcadi; A Clemente; G Messalli; R Malagò; A Weustink; N Mollet; K Nieman; D Ardissino; P de Feyter; G Krestin; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Detection of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women: the significance of integrated stress imaging tests in a 4-year prognostic study.

Authors:  Michael Becker; Anne Hundemer; Christian Zwicker; Ertunc Altiok; Thomas Krohn; Felix M Mottaghy; Christina Lente; Malte Kelm; Nikolaus Marx; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  The clinical value of single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in cardiac risk stratification of very elderly patients (≥80 years) with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sanjeev U Nair; Alan W Ahlberg; Shishir Mathur; Deborah M Katten; Donna M Polk; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department.

Authors:  Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang; Jiaqiong Xu; Elizabeth Gigliotti; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging: a commentary on the reported results from SPARC.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Authors:  Todd D Miller; John Wells Askew; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Prognostic value of myocardium perfusion imaging with a new reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Ronaldo Lima; Lima Ronaldo; Andrea De Lorenzo; De Lorenzo Andrea; Gabriel Camargo; Camargo Gabriel; Gabriel Oliveira; Oliveira Gabriel; Thiago Reis; Reis Thiago; Thais Peclat; Peclat Thais; Tamara Rothstein; Rothstein Tamara; Ilan Gottlieb; Gottlieb Ilan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.952
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.