Literature DB >> 23604110

[Diagnosis and therapy of chronic myocardial ischemia. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging].

S de Waha1, I Eitel, S Desch, G Fuernau, P Lurz, G Schuler, H Thiele.   

Abstract

In patients with chronic coronary artery disease different therapeutic strategies, such as optimal medical therapy, revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting have been shown to improve the prognosis and symptoms and yield proven superiority over other treatment strategies in different patient populations. Thus, individual assessment of cardiac function and structure is of paramount importance to choose the optimal therapeutic strategy and subsequently improve patient prognosis. In this setting cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been shown to provide important diagnostic information. Myocardial ischemia can be detected by either perfusion stress CMR demonstrating perfusion deficits indicative of hemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis or dobutamin stress CMR for objectifying wall motion abnormalities during stress. Both techniques are superior to single photon emission computerized tomography and stress echocardiography in specific patient populations. Myocardial viability can be assessed by means of end-diastolic wall thickness or delayed enhancement imaging which allows quantification of the transmural extent of scarring. Furthermore, low-dose dobutamin stress CMR can detect a contractile reserve. Delayed enhancement imaging leads to accurate results due to its high resolution, can be performed at rest requiring no stress within a short time period and is easy to analyze. Thus this technique can be recommended as the favored technique to assess myocardial viability. In the following article the CMR techniques for ischemia and viability testing will be presented and their role in diagnosis and therapy of chronic myocardial ischemia will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23604110     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-013-3803-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  44 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Alan Rozanski; Leslee J Shaw; Gregg W Stone; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Ishac Cohen; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  High-resolution versus standard-resolution cardiovascular MR myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Neil Maredia; Timothy A Fairbairn; Sebastian Kozerke; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  E Nagel; H B Lehmkuhl; W Bocksch; C Klein; U Vogel; E Frantz; A Ellmer; S Dreysse; E Fleck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Patricia Nguyen; Peter Staehr; S Richard Underwood; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

7.  Head-to-head comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging in men with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Eric P Viergever; Ernst E van Der Wall; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Timothy Lockie; Masaki Ishida; Divaka Perera; Amedeo Chiribiri; Kalpa De Silva; Sebastian Kozerke; Mike Marber; Eike Nagel; Reza Rezavi; Simon Redwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Sanjay Kumak Prasad; Ornella E Rimoldi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of exercise cardiogoniometry in coronary artery disease diagnostics.

Authors:  A Weber; J Smid; B Luani; R C Braun-Dullaeus; I Tanev
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.