BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnostic accuracy of hepatic ultrasonography (US) for detection and grading of hepatic steatosis in children with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of ultrasonographic quantification of hepatic steatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 208 consecutive pediatric patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Hepatic US was performed within 1 month of the liver biopsy procedure. Steatosis identified by US was scored using a 0 to 3 scale based on echogenicity and visualization of vasculature, parenchyma, and diaphragm, and compared to histological features based on Brunt's classification. RESULTS: The median age at time of first visit was 10.8 years and 64% were boys. Sixty-nine percent had moderate to severe steatosis on histology. Ultrasonographic steatosis score (USS) had an excellent correlation with histological grade of steatosis (with a Spearman's coefficient of 0.80). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ultrasonographic detection of moderate-to-severe steatosis was 0.87. The USS did not correlate significantly with inflammatory activity or fibrosis stage; however, there was significant correlation with the NAFLD activity score (NAS), albeit this was in large part the result of the strong correlation with the steatosis component of NAS. Serum alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase were not associated with histological grade of steatosis and showed no correlation with USS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, which represent the largest prospective pediatric study evaluating the role of hepatic US in children with biopsy-proven NAFLD, demonstrate the utility of this technique for noninvasive diagnosis and estimation of hepatic steatosis in children.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnostic accuracy of hepatic ultrasonography (US) for detection and grading of hepatic steatosis in children with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of ultrasonographic quantification of hepatic steatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 208 consecutive pediatric patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Hepatic US was performed within 1 month of the liver biopsy procedure. Steatosis identified by US was scored using a 0 to 3 scale based on echogenicity and visualization of vasculature, parenchyma, and diaphragm, and compared to histological features based on Brunt's classification. RESULTS: The median age at time of first visit was 10.8 years and 64% were boys. Sixty-nine percent had moderate to severe steatosis on histology. Ultrasonographic steatosis score (USS) had an excellent correlation with histological grade of steatosis (with a Spearman's coefficient of 0.80). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ultrasonographic detection of moderate-to-severe steatosis was 0.87. The USS did not correlate significantly with inflammatory activity or fibrosis stage; however, there was significant correlation with the NAFLD activity score (NAS), albeit this was in large part the result of the strong correlation with the steatosis component of NAS. Serum alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase were not associated with histological grade of steatosis and showed no correlation with USS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, which represent the largest prospective pediatric study evaluating the role of hepatic US in children with biopsy-proven NAFLD, demonstrate the utility of this technique for noninvasive diagnosis and estimation of hepatic steatosis in children.
Authors: Saul Genuth; K G M M Alberti; Peter Bennett; John Buse; Ralph Defronzo; Richard Kahn; John Kitzmiller; William C Knowler; Harold Lebovitz; Ake Lernmark; David Nathan; Jerry Palmer; Robert Rizza; Christopher Saudek; Jonathan Shaw; Michael Steffes; Michael Stern; Jaako Tuomilehto; Paul Zimmet Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson Journal: Adv Data Date: 2000-06-08
Authors: A Franzese; P Vajro; A Argenziano; A Puzziello; M P Iannucci; M C Saviano; F Brunetti; A Rubino Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Winston Dunn; Gregory J Norman; Perrie E Pardee; Michael S Middleton; Nanda Kerkar; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Sherif Saadeh; Zobair M Younossi; Erick M Remer; Terry Gramlich; Janus P Ong; Maja Hurley; Kevin D Mullen; James N Cooper; Michael J Sheridan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Saurabh Chandan; Babu P Mohan; Shahab R Khan; Antonio Facciorusso; Daryl Ramai; Lena L Kassab; Neil Bhogal; Ravishankar Asokkumar; Gortrand Lopez-Nava; Stephanie McDonough; Douglas G Adler Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Peter Jarcuska; Sylvia Drazilova; Jan Fedacko; Daniel Pella; Martin Janicko Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Hannah I Awai; Kimberly P Newton; Claude B Sirlin; Cynthia Behling; Jeffrey B Schwimmer Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Emily R Perito; Patrika M Tsai; Sarah Hawley; Robert H Lustig; Vickie A Feldstein Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.153