Literature DB >> 23054603

Feedback-dependent generalization.

Jordan A Taylor1, Laura L Hieber, Richard B Ivry.   

Abstract

Generalization provides a window into the representational changes that occur during motor learning. Neural network models have been integral in revealing how the neural representation constrains the extent of generalization. Specifically, two key features are thought to define the pattern of generalization. First, generalization is constrained by the properties of the underlying neural units; with directionally tuned units, the extent of generalization is limited by the width of the tuning functions. Second, error signals are used to update a sensorimotor map to align the desired and actual output, with a gradient-descent learning rule ensuring that the error produces changes in those units responsible for the error. In prior studies, task-specific effects in generalization have been attributed to differences in neural tuning functions. Here we ask whether differences in generalization functions may arise from task-specific error signals. We systematically varied visual error information in a visuomotor adaptation task and found that this manipulation led to qualitative differences in generalization. A neural network model suggests that these differences are the result of error feedback processing operating on a homogeneous and invariant set of tuning functions. Consistent with novel predictions derived from the model, increasing the number of training directions led to specific distortions of the generalization function. Taken together, the behavioral and modeling results offer a parsimonious account of generalization that is based on the utilization of feedback information to update a sensorimotor map with stable tuning functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054603      PMCID: PMC3545161          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00247.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets.

Authors:  T Flash; E Henis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation through interaction between posterior parietal and motor cortical areas.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements.

Authors:  Z M Pine; J W Krakauer; J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Learning not to generalize: modular adaptation of visuomotor gain.

Authors:  Toni S Pearson; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; A B Schwartz; R E Kettner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Rapid reshaping of human motor generalization.

Authors:  Kurt A Thoroughman; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: how much and when?

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; James R Tresilian; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  A single-rate context-dependent learning process underlies rapid adaptation to familiar object dynamics.

Authors:  James N Ingram; Ian S Howard; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  28 in total

1.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Reduced transfer of visuomotor adaptation is associated with aberrant sense of agency in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Karthik G Murthy; Justin Fitzgerald; Barbara L Schwartz; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor adaptation and generalization of reaching movements using motor primitives based on spatial coordinates.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Generalization via superposition: combined effects of mixed reference frame representations for explicit and implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Eugene Poh; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Implications of plan-based generalization in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Impaired visuomotor generalization by inconsistent attentional contexts.

Authors:  Tony S L Wang; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Error-driven learning in statistical summary perception.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.