Literature DB >> 30943112

Generalization via superposition: combined effects of mixed reference frame representations for explicit and implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Eugene Poh1, Jordan A Taylor1,2.   

Abstract

Studies on generalization of learned visuomotor perturbations have generally focused on whether learning is coded in extrinsic or intrinsic reference frames. This dichotomy, however, is challenged by recent findings showing that learning is represented in a mixed reference frame. Overlooked in this framework is how learning appears to consist of multiple processes, such as explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation. Therefore, the proposed mixed representation may simply reflect the superposition of explicit and implicit generalization functions, each represented in different reference frames. Here we characterized the individual generalization functions of explicit and implicit learning in relative isolation to determine whether their combination could predict the overall generalization function when both processes are in operation. We modified the form of feedback in a visuomotor rotation task in an attempt to isolate explicit and implicit learning and tested generalization across new limb postures to dissociate the extrinsic/intrinsic representations. We found that the amplitude of explicit generalization was reduced with postural change and was only marginally shifted, resembling an extrinsic representation. In contrast, implicit generalization maintained its amplitude but was significantly shifted, resembling a mixed representation. A linear combination of individual explicit and implicit generalization functions accounted for nearly 85% of the variance associated with the generalization function in a typical visuomotor rotation task, where both processes are in operation. This suggests that each form of learning results from a mixed representation with distinct extrinsic and intrinsic contributions and the combination of these features shapes the generalization pattern observed at novel limb postures. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Generalization following learning in visuomotor adaptation tasks can reflect how the brain represents what it learns. In this study, we isolated explicit and implicit forms of learning and showed that they are derived from a mixed reference frame representation with distinct extrinsic and intrinsic contributions. Furthermore, we showed that the overall generalization pattern at novel workspaces is due to the superposition of independent generalization effects developed by explicit and implicit learning processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  explicit and implicit learning; generalization; motor learning; reference frames; visuomotor rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30943112      PMCID: PMC6589711          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00624.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  51 in total

1.  Endpoints of arm movements to visual targets.

Authors:  J J van den Dobbelsteen; E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Integration of target and hand position signals in the posterior parietal cortex: effects of workspace and hand vision.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The generalization of visuomotor learning to untrained movements and movement sequences based on movement vector and goal location remapping.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotations in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-03

6.  Motor learning by field approximation.

Authors:  F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements.

Authors:  Z M Pine; J W Krakauer; J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use.

Authors:  Samuel N Brudner; Nikhit Kethidi; Damaris Graeupner; Richard B Ivry; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  How different effectors and action effects modulate the formation of separate motor memories.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Lisa Langsdorf; Jordan A Taylor; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.