Literature DB >> 23054067

Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos.

A Mertzanidou1, L Wilton, J Cheng, C Spits, E Vanneste, Y Moreau, J R Vermeesch, K Sermon.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the aneuploidy rates and incidence of mosaicism in good-quality human preimplantation embryos. SUMMARY ANSWER: High-level mosaicism and structural aberrations are not restricted to arrested or poorly developing embryos but are also common in good-quality IVF embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Humans, compared with other mammals, have a poor fertility rate, and even IVF treatments have a relatively low success rate. It is known that human gametes and early preimplantation embryos carry chromosomal abnormalities that are thought to lower their developmental potential. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: The embryos studied came from nine young (age <35 years old) IVF patients and were part of a cohort of embryos that all resulted in healthy births. These 14 embryos inseminated by ICSI and cryopreserved on Day 2 of development were thawed, cultured overnight and allowed to succumb by being left at room temperature for 24 h. Following removal of the zona pellucida, blastomeres were disaggregated and collected. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: There were 91 single blastomeres collected and amplified by multiple displacement amplification. Array-comparative genomic hybridization was performed on the amplified DNA. Array-data were normalized and aneuploidy was detected by the circular binary segmentation method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The good-quality embryos exhibited high rates of aneuploidy, 10 of 14 (71.4%) of the embryos being mosaic. While none of the embryos had the same aneuploidy pattern in all cells, 4 of 14 (28.6%) were uniformly diploid. Of the 70 analysed blastomeres, 55.7% were diploid and 44.3% had chromosomal abnormalities, while 29% of the abnormal cells carried structural aberrations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Finding such a high rate of aneuploidy and mosaicism in excellent quality embryos from cycles with a high implantation rate warrants further research on the origin and significance of chromosomal abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by the Instituut voor de aanmoediging van innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie in Vlaanderen (IWT-Vlaanderen). A.M. is a PhD student at the IWT-Vlaanderen. C.S. is a postdoctoral fellow at the FWO Vlaanderen. There are no competing interests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054067     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  49 in total

Review 1.  Whole-Exome Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Neonates Suspected to Have Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Laurie D Smith; Laurel K Willig; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study.

Authors:  Jos Dreesen; Aspasia Destouni; Georgia Kourlaba; Birte Degn; Wulf Christensen Mette; Filipa Carvalho; Celine Moutou; Sioban Sengupta; Seema Dhanjal; Pamela Renwick; Steven Davies; Emmanouel Kanavakis; Gary Harton; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Mosaic variegated aneuploidy in mouse BubR1 deficient embryos and pregnancy loss in human.

Authors:  Michael Schmid; Claus Steinlein; Qi Tian; Amy E Hanlon Newell; Manfred Gessler; Susan B Olson; Andreas Rosenwald; Burkhard Kneitz; Lev M Fedorov
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Mosaic embryo transfer after oocyte in vitro maturation in combination with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-first report of a euploid live birth.

Authors:  Naomi Inoue; Rosmary Lopez; Andrea Delgado; Denisse Nuñez; Jimmy Portella; Luis Noriega-Hoces; Luis Guzmán
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  T V Nikitina; E A Sazhenova; D I Zhigalina; E N Tolmacheva; N N Sukhanova; I N Lebedev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of each blastomere in good-quality embryos: insights into the origins and mechanisms of embryonic aneuploidy in cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Qiuwen Shi; Ying Qiu; Changlong Xu; Hua Yang; Chunyuan Li; Nina Li; Yumei Gao; Caiyun Yu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing.

Authors:  Hiroki Kurahashi; Takema Kato; Jun Miyazaki; Haruki Nishizawa; Eiji Nishio; Hiroshi Furukawa; Hironori Miyamura; Mayuko Ito; Toshiaki Endo; Yuya Ouchi; Hidehito Inagaki; Takuma Fujii
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 8.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Could monopronucleated ICSI zygotes be considered for transfer? Analysis through time-lapse monitoring and PGS.

Authors:  S Mateo; F Vidal; M Parriego; I Rodríguez; V Montalvo; A Veiga; M Boada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Mouse is the new woman? Translational research in reproductive immunology.

Authors:  David A Clark
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 9.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.