Literature DB >> 24301057

Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study.

Jos Dreesen1, Aspasia Destouni2, Georgia Kourlaba3, Birte Degn4, Wulf Christensen Mette4, Filipa Carvalho5, Celine Moutou6, Sioban Sengupta7, Seema Dhanjal7, Pamela Renwick8, Steven Davies9, Emmanouel Kanavakis2, Gary Harton10, Joanne Traeger-Synodinos2.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogenic disorders currently involves polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, which must be robust, sensitive and highly accurate, precluding misdiagnosis. Twelve adverse misdiagnoses reported to the ESHRE PGD-Consortium are likely an underestimate. This retrospective study, involving six PGD centres, assessed the validity of PCR-based PGD through reanalysis of untransferred embryos from monogenic-PGD cycles. Data were collected on the genotype concordance at PGD and follow-up from 940 untransferred embryos, including details on the parameters of PGD cycles: category of monogenic disease, embryo morphology, embryo biopsy and genotype assay strategy. To determine the validity of PCR-based PGD, the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Stratified analyses were also conducted to assess the influence of the parameters above on the validity of PCR-based PGD. The analysis of overall data showed that 93.7% of embryos had been correctly classified at the time of PGD, with Se of 99.2% and Sp of 80.9%. The stratified analyses found that diagnostic accuracy is statistically significantly higher when PGD is performed on two cells versus one cell (P=0.001). Se was significantly higher when multiplex protocols versus singleplex protocols were applied (P=0.005), as well as for PGD applied on cells from good compared with poor morphology embryos (P=0.032). Morphology, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy. Multiplex PCR-based methods on one cell, are as robust as those on two cells regarding false negative rate, which is the most important criteria for clinical PGD applications. Overall, this study demonstrates the validity, robustness and high diagnostic value of PCR-based PGD.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24301057      PMCID: PMC4350594          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  23 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jannie van Echten-Arends; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Johanna C Korevaar; Maas Jan Heineman; Fulco van der Veen; Sjoerd Repping
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: recent triumphs and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Sioban B SenGupta; Joy D A Delhanty
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome.

Authors:  Magdalena Bielanska; Seang Lin Tan; Asangla Ao
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Magdalena Bielanska; Shaoguang Jin; Martin Bernier; Seang Lin Tan; Asangla Ao
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos.

Authors:  A Mertzanidou; L Wilton; J Cheng; C Spits; E Vanneste; Y Moreau; J R Vermeesch; K Sermon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection.

Authors:  J C Harper; L Wilton; J Traeger-Synodinos; V Goossens; C Moutou; S B SenGupta; T Pehlivan Budak; P Renwick; M De Rycke; J P M Geraedts; G Harton
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases: overview and emerging issues.

Authors:  Pamela Renwick; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.225

8.  Single-sperm analysis for haplotype construction of de-novo paternal mutations: application to PGD for neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  G Altarescu; B Brooks; Y Kaplan; T Eldar-Geva; E J Margalioth; E Levy-Lahad; P Renbaum
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Real-time reverse linkage using polar body analysis for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in female carriers of de novo mutations.

Authors:  Gheona Altarescu; Talia Eldar-Geva; Irit Varshower; Barry Brooks; Edith Zylber Haran; Ehud J Margalioth; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Paul Renbaum
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Fighting in the legal grey area: an analysis of the German Federal Court of Justice decision in case preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Susanne Benöhr-Laqueur
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2011-06-28
View more
  22 in total

1.  The clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Xinghua Huang; Yun Liu; Xiurong Yu; Qiuxiang Huang; Chunli Lin; Jian Zeng; Fenghua Lan; Zhihong Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an update on current technologies and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Kou Sueoka
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-14

5.  Live births after simultaneous avoidance of monogenic diseases and chromosome abnormality by next-generation sequencing with linkage analyses.

Authors:  Liying Yan; Lei Huang; Liya Xu; Jin Huang; Fei Ma; Xiaohui Zhu; Yaqiong Tang; Mingshan Liu; Ying Lian; Ping Liu; Rong Li; Sijia Lu; Fuchou Tang; Jie Qiao; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Fragile X syndrome: two new powerful single-round multiplex indirect and direct tests.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Kieffer; Jean-Christophe Nicod; Nathalie Gardes; Claire Kastner; Nicolas Becker; Catherine Celebi; Olivier Pirrello; Catherine Rongières; Isabelle Koscinski; Philippe Gosset; Céline Moutou
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Literacy assessment of preimplantation genetic patient education materials exceed national reading levels.

Authors:  Macy L Early; Priyanka Kumar; Arik V Marcell; Cathleen Lawson; Mindy Christianson; Lydia H Pecker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Acceptable, hopeful, and useful: development and mixed-method evaluation of an educational tool about reproductive options for people with sickle cell disease or trait.

Authors:  Isabel V Lake; Jake A Ruddy; James A Saba; Sajya M Singh; Macy L Early; Rachel J Strodel; Sophie Lanzkron; Jennifer W Mack; Emily R Meier; Mindy S Christianson; Lydia H Pecker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; Sigal Gooldin; David A Zeevi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Life paths of patients with transthyretin-related familial amyloid polyneuropathy Val30Met: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Alice Lopes; Alexandra Sousa; Isabel Fonseca; Margarida Branco; Carla Rodrigues; Teresa Coelho; Jorge Sequeiros; Paula Freitas
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.