Literature DB >> 23049136

Estimating treatment effects with treatment switching via semicompeting risks models: an application to a colorectal cancer study.

Donglin Zeng1, Qingxia Chen, Ming-Hui Chen, Joseph G Ibrahim.   

Abstract

Treatment switching is a frequent occurrence in clinical trials, where, during the course of the trial, patients who fail on the control treatment may change to the experimental treatment. Analysing the data without accounting for switching yields highly biased and inefficient estimates of the treatment effect. In this paper, we propose a novel class of semiparametric semicompeting risks transition survival models to accommodate treatment switches. Theoretical properties of the proposed model are examined and an efficient expectation-maximization algorithm is derived for obtaining the maximum likelihood estimates. Simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate the superiority of the model compared with the intent-to-treat analysis and other methods proposed in the literature. The proposed method is applied to data from a colorectal cancer clinical trial.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23049136      PMCID: PMC3412606          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asr062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  19 in total

1.  Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Adjusting treatment comparisons to account for non-randomized interventions: an example from an angina trial.

Authors:  Ian R White; James Carpenter; Stuart J Pocock; Robert A Henderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Calculation of sample size in survival trials: the impact of informative noncompliance.

Authors:  Qi Jiang; Steven Snapinn; Boris Iglewicz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Statistical inference for cancer trials with treatment switching.

Authors:  Jun Shao; Mark Chang; Shein-Chung Chow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A simple stochastic model of recovery, relapse, death and loss of patients.

Authors:  E FIX; J NEYMAN
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 0.553

6.  A GENERAL ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION IN SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION MODELS WITH CENSORED DATA.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; D Y Lin
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.261

7.  Survival analyses of randomized clinical trials adjusted for patients who switch treatments.

Authors:  M G Law; J M Kaldor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Phase II randomized comparison of topotecan plus cyclophosphamide versus topotecan alone in children with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Wendy B London; Christopher N Frantz; Laura A Campbell; Robert C Seeger; Babette A Brumback; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay; Robert P Castleberry; Lisa Diller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Evaluation of sample size and power for analyses of survival with allowance for nonuniform patient entry, losses to follow-up, noncompliance, and stratification.

Authors:  J M Lachin; M A Foulkes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  16 in total

1.  Quantifying time-varying cause-specific hazard and subdistribution hazard ratios with competing risks data.

Authors:  Guoqing Diao; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Bayesian Semi-parametric Analysis of Semi-competing Risks Data: Investigating Hospital Readmission after a Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kyu Ha Lee; Sebastien Haneuse; Deborah Schrag; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Bayesian gamma frailty models for survival data with semi-competing risks and treatment switching.

Authors:  Yuanye Zhang; Ming-Hui Chen; Joseph G Ibrahim; Donglin Zeng; Qingxia Chen; Zhiying Pan; Xiaodong Xue
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A Multi-state Model for Designing Clinical Trials for Testing Overall Survival Allowing for Crossover after Progression.

Authors:  Fang Xia; Stephen L George; Xiaofei Wang
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 1.452

5.  A Bayesian multi-risks survival (MRS) model in the presence of double censorings.

Authors:  Mário de Castro; Ming-Hui Chen; Yuanye Zhang; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  SemiCompRisks: An R Package for the Analysis of Independent and Cluster-correlated Semi-competing Risks Data.

Authors:  Danilo Alvares; Sebastien Haneuse; Catherine Lee; Kyu Ha Lee
Journal:  R J       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data.

Authors:  Fei Jiang; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.396

8.  Bayesian path specific frailty models for multi-state survival data with applications.

Authors:  Mário de Castro; Ming-Hui Chen; Yuanye Zhang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Estimating time-varying effects for overdispersed recurrent events data with treatment switching.

Authors:  Qingxia Chen; Donglin Zeng; Joseph G Ibrahim; Mouna Akacha; Heinz Schmidli
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.445

10.  Kernel machine score test for pathway analysis in the presence of semi-competing risks.

Authors:  Matey Neykov; Boris P Hejblum; Jennifer A Sinnott
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.