Literature DB >> 20660830

Phase II randomized comparison of topotecan plus cyclophosphamide versus topotecan alone in children with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Wendy B London1, Christopher N Frantz, Laura A Campbell, Robert C Seeger, Babette A Brumback, Susan L Cohn, Katherine K Matthay, Robert P Castleberry, Lisa Diller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single-agent topotecan (TOPO) and combination topotecan and cyclophosphamide (TOPO/CTX) were compared in a phase II randomized trial in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Because responders often underwent further therapies, novel statistical methods were required to compare the long-term outcome of the two treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with refractory/recurrent neuroblastoma (only one prior aggressive chemotherapy regimen) were randomly assigned to daily 5-day topotecan (2 mg/m(2)) or combination topotecan (0.75 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m(2)). A randomized two-stage group sequential design enrolled 119 eligible patients. Toxicity and response were estimated. Long-term outcome of protocol therapy was assessed using novel methods-causal inference-which allowed adjustment for the confounding effect of off-study therapies.
RESULTS: Seven more responses were observed for TOPO/CTX (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR], 18 [32%] of 57) than TOPO (CR+PR, 11 [19%] of 59;P = .081); toxicity was similar. At 3 years, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4% +/- 2% and 15% +/- 4%, respectively. PFS was significantly better for TOPO/CTX (P = .029); there was no difference in OS. Older age at diagnosis and lack of MYCN amplification predicted increased OS (P < .05). Adjusting for randomized treatment effect and subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, there was no difference between TOPO and TOPO/CTX in terms of the proportion alive at 2 years.
CONCLUSION: TOPO/CTX was superior to TOPO in terms of PFS, but there was no OS difference. After adjustment for subsequent therapies, no difference was detected in the proportion alive at 2 years. Causal inference methods for assessing long-term outcomes of phase II therapies after subsequent treatment can elucidate effects of initial therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660830      PMCID: PMC2940398          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

1.  Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) study of topotecan using a five-day course in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study.

Authors:  D G Tubergen; C F Stewart; C B Pratt; W C Zamboni; N Winick; V M Santana; Z A Dryer; J Kurtzberg; B Bell; H Grier; T J Vietti
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.289

2.  Up-front window trial of topotecan in previously untreated children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: an intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study.

Authors:  A S Pappo; E Lyden; J Breneman; E Wiener; L Teot; J Meza; W Crist; T Vietti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cyclophosphamide plus topotecan in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group phase II study.

Authors:  R L Saylors; K C Stine; J Sullivan; J L Kepner; D A Wall; M L Bernstein; M B Harris; R Hayashi; T J Vietti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Phase II trial of topotecan administered as 72-hour continuous infusion in children with refractory solid tumors: a collaborative Pediatric Branch, National Cancer Institute, and Children's Cancer Group Study.

Authors:  S M Blaney; M N Needle; A Gillespie; J K Sato; G H Reaman; S L Berg; P C Adamson; M D Krailo; W A Bleyer; D G Poplack; F M Balis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Phase I study of topotecan in combination with cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  R L Saylors; C F Stewart; W C Zamboni; D A Wall; B Bell; K C Stine; T J Vietti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Response to paclitaxel, topotecan, and topotecan-cyclophosphamide in children with untreated disseminated neuroblastoma treated in an upfront phase II investigational window: a pediatric oncology group study.

Authors:  Cynthia S Kretschmar; Morris Kletzel; Kevin Murray; Paul Thorner; Vijay Joshi; Robert Marcus; E Ide Smith; Wendy B London; Robert Castleberry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Factors influencing survival in children with recurrent neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Loretta Lau; Derek Tai; Sheila Weitzman; Ronald Grant; Sylvain Baruchel; David Malkin
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.289

Review 8.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.

Authors:  G M Brodeur; J Pritchard; F Berthold; N L Carlsen; V Castel; R P Castelberry; B De Bernardi; A E Evans; M Favrot; F Hedborg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of topotecan administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion.

Authors:  S M Blaney; F M Balis; D E Cole; C Craig; J M Reid; M M Ames; M Krailo; G Reaman; D Hammond; D G Poplack
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Phase I study of topotecan for pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors.

Authors:  C B Pratt; C Stewart; V M Santana; L Bowman; W Furman; J Ochs; N Marina; J F Kuttesch; R Heideman; J T Sandlund
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  38 in total

1.  Pilot induction regimen incorporating pharmacokinetically guided topotecan for treatment of newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Julie R Park; Jeffrey R Scott; Clinton F Stewart; Wendy B London; Arlene Naranjo; Victor M Santana; Peter J Shaw; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A phase I/II study of CY and topotecan in patients with high-risk malignancies undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: the St Jude long-term follow-up.

Authors:  K A Kasow; C F Stewart; R C Barfield; N L Wright; C Li; D K Srivastava; W Leung; E M Horwitz; L C Bowman; R Handgretinger; G A Hale
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Improved two-stage tests for stratified phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Myron N Chang; Jonathan J Shuster; Wei Hou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Estimating treatment effects with treatment switching via semicompeting risks models: an application to a colorectal cancer study.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; Qingxia Chen; Ming-Hui Chen; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 5.  Neuroblastoma: clinical and biological approach to risk stratification and treatment.

Authors:  Vanessa P Tolbert; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Irinotecan, Temozolomide, and Dinutuximab With GM-CSF in Children With Refractory or Relapsed Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Rajen Mody; Alice L Yu; Arlene Naranjo; Fan F Zhang; Wendy B London; Barry L Shulkin; Marguerite T Parisi; Sabah-E-Noor Servaes; Mitchell B Diccianni; Jacquelyn A Hank; Mildred Felder; Jennifer Birstler; Paul M Sondel; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Julia Glade-Bender; Howard Katzenstein; John M Maris; Julie R Park; Rochelle Bagatell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Dinutuximab Beta for Treating Neuroblastoma: An Evidence Review Group and Decision Support Unit Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

Authors:  Becky Pennington; Shije Ren; Samantha Barton; Mariana Bacelar; Steven J Edwards
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The quinoxaline anti-tumor agent (R+)XK469 inhibits neuroblastoma tumor growth.

Authors:  Nisha C Kakodkar; Radhika Peddinti; Morris Kletzel; Yufeng Tian; Lisa J Guerrero; Samir D Undevia; David Geary; Alexandre Chlenski; Qiwei Yang; Helen R Salwen; Susan L Cohn
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  A single center clinical analysis of children with neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jing-Bo Shao; Zheng-Hua Lu; Wen-Yan Huang; Zhi-Bao Lv; Hui Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Managing local-regional failure in children with high-risk neuroblastoma: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Austin P Dove; Bogdan-Alexandru Manole; Daniel V Wakefield; Shane J Cross; Michael Doubrovin; Barry L Shulkin; Thomas E Merchant; Andrew M Davidoff; Wayne L Furman; Matthew J Krasin; Victor M Santana; John T Lucas
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.