Literature DB >> 15339304

Calculation of sample size in survival trials: the impact of informative noncompliance.

Qi Jiang1, Steven Snapinn, Boris Iglewicz.   

Abstract

Sample size calculations for survival trials typically include an adjustment to account for the expected rate of noncompliance, or discontinuation from study medication. Existing sample size methods assume that when patients discontinue, they do so independently of their risk of an endpoint; that is, that noncompliance is noninformative. However, this assumption is not always true, as we illustrate using results from a published clinical trial database. In this article, we introduce a modified version of the method proposed by Lakatos (1988, Biometrics 44, 229-241) that can be used to calculate sample size under informative noncompliance. This method is based on the concept of two subpopulations: one with high rates of endpoint and discontinuation and another with low rates. Using this new method, we show that failure to consider the impact of informative noncompliance can lead to a considerably underpowered study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15339304     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; Christophe Vaessen; Vincent Hupertan; Eva Comperat; Vincent Misraï; Alain Haertig; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Estimating treatment effects with treatment switching via semicompeting risks models: an application to a colorectal cancer study.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; Qingxia Chen; Ming-Hui Chen; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Differential losses to follow-up that are outcome-dependent can vitiate a clinical trial: Simulation results.

Authors:  Richard F Potthoff
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Circulating microRNA miR-137 as a stable biomarker for methamphetamine abstinence.

Authors:  Baeksun Kim; Sung Hyun Tag; Yong Sik Kim; Sung Nam Cho; Heh-In Im
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials.

Authors:  Steven M Snapinn; Qi Jiang; Boris Iglewicz
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-07-03

6.  Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design.

Authors:  Alexander Pate; Jane Candlish; Matthew Sperrin; Tjeerd Pieter Van Staa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.