Literature DB >> 23049123

Calibrating parametric subject-specific risk estimation.

T Cai1, L Tian, Hajime Uno, Scott D Solomon, L J Wei.   

Abstract

For modern evidence-based medicine, decisions on disease prevention or management strategies are often guided by a risk index system. For each individual, the system uses his/her baseline information to estimate the risk of experiencing a future disease-related clinical event. Such a risk scoring scheme is usually derived from an overly simplified parametric model. To validate a model-based procedure, one may perform a standard global evaluation via, for instance, a receiver operating characteristic analysis. In this article, we propose a method to calibrate the risk index system at a subject level. Specifically, we developed point and interval estimation procedures for t-year mortality rates conditional on the estimated parametric risk score. The proposals are illustrated with a dataset from a large clinical trial with post-myocardial infarction patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 23049123      PMCID: PMC3412577          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asq012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  14 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; S Grundy; L M Sullivan; P Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Changes in ventricular size and function in patients treated with valsartan, captopril, or both after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Scott D Solomon; Hicham Skali; Nagesh S Anavekar; Mikhail Bourgoun; Stale Barvik; Jalal K Ghali; J Wayne Warnica; Margarita Khrakovskaya; J Malcolm O Arnold; Yuri Schwartz; Eric J Velazquez; Robert M Califf; John V McMurray; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death.

Authors:  Thomas J Wang; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Geoffrey H Tofler; Daniel Levy; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Paul F Jacques; Nader Rifai; Jacob Selhub; Sander J Robins; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nagesh S Anavekar; John J V McMurray; Eric J Velazquez; Scott D Solomon; Lars Kober; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Harvey D White; Rolf Nordlander; Aldo Maggioni; Kenneth Dickstein; Steven Zelenkofske; Jeffrey D Leimberger; Robert M Califf; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both.

Authors:  Marc A Pfeffer; John J V McMurray; Eric J Velazquez; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Lars Køber; Aldo P Maggioni; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Frans Van de Werf; Harvey White; Jeffrey D Leimberger; Marc Henis; Susan Edwards; Steven Zelenkofske; Mary Ann Sellers; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Brindle; Jonathan Emberson; Fiona Lampe; Mary Walker; Peter Whincup; Tom Fahey; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-29
View more
  26 in total

1.  Analysis of multiple diverse phenotypes via semiparametric canonical correlation analysis.

Authors:  Denis Agniel; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Predicting the restricted mean event time with the subject's baseline covariates in survival analysis.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Lihui Zhao; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Landmark Estimation of Survival and Treatment Effect in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 4.  Recent development on statistical methods for personalized medicine discovery.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhao; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Treatment selections using risk-benefit profiles based on data from comparative randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  Brian Claggett; Lu Tian; Davide Castagno; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Estimation of treatment policies based on functional predictors.

Authors:  Ian W McKeague; Min Qian
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.261

7.  Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.

Authors:  Veronika Skrivankova; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

9.  A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Isaac S Kohane; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Evaluating incremental values from new predictors with net reclassification improvement in survival analysis.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Marshall Brown
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.