Literature DB >> 24659838

Landmark Estimation of Survival and Treatment Effect in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Layla Parast1, Lu Tian2, Tianxi Cai3.   

Abstract

In many studies with a survival outcome, it is often not feasible to fully observe the primary event of interest. This often leads to heavy censoring and thus, difficulty in efficiently estimating survival or comparing survival rates between two groups. In certain diseases, baseline covariates and the event time of non-fatal intermediate events may be associated with overall survival. In these settings, incorporating such additional information may lead to gains in efficiency in estimation of survival and testing for a difference in survival between two treatment groups. If gains in efficiency can be achieved, it may then be possible to decrease the sample size of patients required for a study to achieve a particular power level or decrease the duration of the study. Most existing methods for incorporating intermediate events and covariates to predict survival focus on estimation of relative risk parameters and/or the joint distribution of events under semiparametric models. However, in practice, these model assumptions may not hold and hence may lead to biased estimates of the marginal survival. In this paper, we propose a semi-nonparametric two-stage procedure to estimate and compare t-year survival rates by incorporating intermediate event information observed before some landmark time, which serves as a useful approach to overcome semi-competing risks issues. In a randomized clinical trial setting, we further improve efficiency through an additional calibration step. Simulation studies demonstrate substantial potential gains in efficiency in terms of estimation and power. We illustrate our proposed procedures using an AIDS Clinical Trial Protocol 175 dataset by estimating survival and examining the difference in survival between two treatment groups: zidovudine and zidovudine plus zalcitabine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficiency Augmentation; Kaplan Meier; Landmark Prediction; Semi-competing Risks; Survival Analysis

Year:  2014        PMID: 24659838      PMCID: PMC3960087          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.842488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  15 in total

1.  On the covariate-adjusted estimation for an overall treatment difference with data from a randomized comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Lihui Zhao; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Nonparametric survival estimation using prognostic longitudinal covariates.

Authors:  S Murray; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Dimension reduced kernel estimation for distribution function with incomplete data.

Authors:  Zonghui Hu; Dean A Follmann; Jing Qin
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  Calibrating parametric subject-specific risk estimation.

Authors:  T Cai; L Tian; Hajime Uno; Scott D Solomon; L J Wei
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Semiparametric dimension reduction estimation for mean response with missing data.

Authors:  Zonghui Hu; Dean A Follmann; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Incorporating short-term outcome information to predict long-term survival with discrete markers.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Su-Chun Cheng; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team.

Authors:  S M Hammer; D A Katzenstein; M D Hughes; H Gundacker; R T Schooley; R H Haubrich; W K Henry; M M Lederman; J P Phair; M Niu; M S Hirsch; T C Merigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease: association with treatment-related mortality and relapse.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; John P Klein; A John Barrett; Olle Ringden; Joseph H Antin; Jean-Yves Cahn; Matthew H Carabasi; Robert Peter Gale; Sergio Giralt; Gregory A Hale; Osman Ilhan; Philip L McCarthy; Gerard Socie; Leo F Verdonck; Daniel J Weisdorf; Mary M Horowitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Dynamic predicting by landmarking as an alternative for multi-state modeling: an application to acute lymphoid leukemia data.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Hein Putter
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Bacterial pneumonia in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Pulmonary Complications of HIV Infection Study Group.

Authors:  R E Hirschtick; J Glassroth; M C Jordan; T C Wilcosky; J M Wallace; P A Kvale; N Markowitz; M J Rosen; B T Mangura; P C Hopewell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  16 in total

1.  Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.

Authors:  Iván Díaz; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Daniel F Hanley; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Augmented estimation for t-year survival with censored regression models.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Sizing clinical trials when comparing bivariate time-to-event outcomes.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Scott R Evans; Takashi Sozu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Using a surrogate marker for early testing of a treatment effect.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Dynamic Survival Analysis with Individualized Truncated Parametric Distributions.

Authors:  Preston Putzel; Padhraic Smyth; Jaehong Yu; Hua Zhong
Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res       Date:  2021-03

6.  Dynamic Survival Analysis for EHR Data with Personalized Parametric Distributions.

Authors:  Preston Putzel; Hyungrok Do; Alex Boyd; Hua Zhong; Padhraic Smyth
Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res       Date:  2021-08

7.  Estimating the average treatment effect on survival based on observational data and using partly conditional modeling.

Authors:  Qi Gong; Douglas E Schaubel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Beth Ann Griffin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Dynamic landmark prediction for mixture data.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Layla Parast
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Evaluating multiple surrogate markers with censored data.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.