Literature DB >> 25165416

Estimation of treatment policies based on functional predictors.

Ian W McKeague1, Min Qian2.   

Abstract

Biosignatures such as brain scans, mass spectrometry, or gene expression profiles might one day be used to guide treatment selection and improve outcomes. This article develops a way of estimating optimal treatment policies based on data from randomized clinical trials by interpreting patient biosignatures as functional predictors. A flexible functional regression model is used to represent the treatment effect and construct the estimated policy. The effectiveness of the estimated policy is assessed by furnishing prediction intervals for the mean outcome when all patients follow the policy. The validity of these prediction intervals is established under mild regularity conditions on the functional regression model. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated in numerical studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical processes; Functional data analysis; Inverse treatment probability weighting; Locally efficient estimation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25165416      PMCID: PMC4142446          DOI: 10.5705/ss.2012.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Sin        ISSN: 1017-0405            Impact factor:   1.261


  25 in total

1.  Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A Generalization Error for Q-Learning.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.654

3.  Evaluating subject-level incremental values of new markers for risk classification rule.

Authors:  T Cai; L Tian; D Lloyd-Jones; L J Wei
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Evaluating markers for treatment selection based on survival time.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  Evaluating multiple treatment courses in clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; R E Millikan; H G Sung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Lung cancer signatures in plasma based on proteome profiling of mouse tumor models.

Authors:  Ayumu Taguchi; Katerina Politi; Sharon J Pitteri; William W Lockwood; Vitor M Faça; Karen Kelly-Spratt; Chee-Hong Wong; Qing Zhang; Alice Chin; Kwon-Sik Park; Gary Goodman; Adi F Gazdar; Julien Sage; Daniela M Dinulescu; Raju Kucherlapati; Ronald A Depinho; Christopher J Kemp; Harold E Varmus; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Survival analysis with high-dimensional covariates: an application in microarray studies.

Authors:  David Engler; Yi Li
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-02-11
View more
  16 in total

1.  Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  W Xiao; H H Zhang; W Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection via a robust kernel method.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Youyi Fong
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Identification of the optimal treatment regimen in the presence of missing covariates.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Generated effect modifiers (GEM's) in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; Zhe Su; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Methods for scalar-on-function regression.

Authors:  Philip T Reiss; Jeff Goldsmith; Han Lin Shang; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Flexible functional regression methods for estimating individualized treatment regimes.

Authors:  Adam Ciarleglio; Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Stat (Int Stat Inst)       Date:  2016-05-31

7.  A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Menggang Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection through randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ying Huang
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Constructing treatment decision rules based on scalar and functional predictors when moderators of treatment effect are unknown.

Authors:  Adam Ciarleglio; Eva Petkova; Todd Ogden; Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles.

Authors:  Kristin A Linn; Eric B Laber; Leonard A Stefanski
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.