Literature DB >> 23037800

A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data.

Hajime Uno1, Lu Tian, Tianxi Cai, Isaac S Kohane, L J Wei.   

Abstract

Risk prediction procedures can be quite useful for the patient's treatment selection, prevention strategy, or disease management in evidence-based medicine. Often, potentially important new predictors are available in addition to the conventional markers. The question is how to quantify the improvement from the new markers for prediction of the patient's risk in order to aid cost-benefit decisions. The standard method, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, to measure the added value may not be sensitive enough to capture incremental improvements from the new markers. Recently, some novel alternatives to area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, such as integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement, were proposed. In this paper, we consider a class of measures for evaluating the incremental values of new markers, which includes the preceding two as special cases. We present a unified procedure for making inferences about measures in the class with censored event time data. The large sample properties of our procedures are theoretically justified. We illustrate the new proposal with data from a cancer study to evaluate a new gene score for prediction of the patient's survival.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23037800      PMCID: PMC3734387          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.

Authors:  T Cai; S Cheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Julie B Sneddon; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani; Therese Sørlie; Hongyue Dai; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Harry Bartelink; Matt van de Rijn; Patrick O Brown; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  127 in total

1.  Higher Activation of the Rostromedial Prefrontal Cortex During Mental Stress Predicts Major Cardiovascular Disease Events in Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Kasra Moazzami; Matthew T Wittbrodt; Bruno B Lima; Jonathon A Nye; Puja K Mehta; Brad D Pearce; Zakaria Almuwaqqat; Muhammad Hammadah; Oleksiy Levantsevych; Yan V Sun; Paolo Raggi; Ernest V Garcia; Margarethe Goetz; Arshed A Quyyumi; J Douglas Bremner; Viola Vaccarino; Amit J Shah
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Validation of survival prognostic models for non-small-cell lung cancer in stage- and age-specific groups.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Lin Gu; Ying Zhang; Daniel J Sargent; William Richards; Apar Kishor Ganti; Jeffery Crawford; Harvey Jay Cohen; Thomas Stinchcombe; Everett Vokes; Herbert Pang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Application of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) Classification: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  John P Donnelly; Monika M Safford; Nathan I Shapiro; John W Baddley; Henry E Wang
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Use of exercise capacity to improve SCORE risk prediction model in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Ariel Israel; Shaye Kivity; Yechezkel Sidi; Shlomo Segev; Anat Berkovitch; Robert Klempfner; Bruno Lavi; Ilan Goldenberg; Elad Maor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Financial and Health Literacy Predict Incident Alzheimer's Disease Dementia and Pathology.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Robert S Wilson; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Patricia A Boyle
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Decline in Kidney Function in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Salim S Hayek; Douglas P Landsittel; Changli Wei; Martin Zeier; Alan S L Yu; Vicente E Torres; Sharin Roth; Christina S Pao; Jochen Reiser
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Contemporary Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Brian Claggett; Dalane Kitzman; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Jan Skov Jensen; Susan Cheng; Kunihiro Matsushita; Suma Konety; Aaron R Folsom; Thomas H Mosley; Jacqueline D Wright; Gerardo Heiss; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Adopting nested case-control quota sampling designs for the evaluation of risk markers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Preoperative Prognostic Prediction Nomogram in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Choi; Yun-Suhk Suh; Yunhee Choi; Jiyeon Han; Tae Han Kim; Shin-Hoo Park; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Spot urine sodium excretion as prognostic marker in acutely decompensated heart failure: the spironolactone effect.

Authors:  João Pedro Ferreira; Nicolas Girerd; Pedro Bettencourt Medeiros; Mário Santos; Henrique Cyrne Carvalho; Paulo Bettencourt; David Kénizou; Javed Butler; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.