Literature DB >> 15967846

Changes in ventricular size and function in patients treated with valsartan, captopril, or both after myocardial infarction.

Scott D Solomon1, Hicham Skali, Nagesh S Anavekar, Mikhail Bourgoun, Stale Barvik, Jalal K Ghali, J Wayne Warnica, Margarita Khrakovskaya, J Malcolm O Arnold, Yuri Schwartz, Eric J Velazquez, Robert M Califf, John V McMurray, Marc A Pfeffer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to attenuate left ventricular (LV) enlargement in association with reducing mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). Preclinical data suggest that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may have similar structural and functional effects after MI. The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) Echo study was designed to test the hypothesis that the ARB valsartan, either alone or in combination with captopril, could attenuate progressive LV enlargement or improve LV ejection fraction to a greater extent than captopril alone. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Six hundred ten patients enrolled in the main VALIANT study who experienced MI and evidence of LV dysfunction, heart failure, or both were enrolled in the VALIANT Echo study. Patients were randomized to receive valsartan 160 mg PO BID, captopril 50 mg PO TID, or valsartan 80 mg PO BID plus captopril 50 mg PO TID between 1 and 10 days after MI. Six hundred three patients had echocardiograms of sufficient quality for quantitative analysis. Echocardiograms were digitized, and endocardial borders were traced manually from 2 short-axis and 2 apical views. Ventricular volumes, ejection fractions, combined areas, and infarct segment length were measured, and changes in echocardiographic measures from baseline to 20 months were compared between treatment groups. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar in the 3 treatment arms. The changes from baseline to 20 months in all echocardiographic parameters were similar in all 3 treatment arms. Baseline echocardiographic measures of ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, and infarct segment length were highly predictive of outcomes including total mortality, death or hospitalization for heart failure, or death or any cardiovascular event (heart failure, MI, stroke, resuscitated sudden death), even after adjustment for known covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the ACE inhibitor captopril, valsartan, or the combination of captopril plus valsartan resulted in similar changes in cardiac volume, ejection fraction, and infarct segment length between baseline and 20 months after MI. Baseline echocardiographic measures were powerfully and independently predictive of all major outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967846     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.508093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  79 in total

Review 1.  Reverse remodeling in heart failure--mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Norimichi Koitabashi; David A Kass
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Mechanisms and predictors of mitral regurgitation after high-risk myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Alessandra Meris; Maria Amigoni; Anil Verma; Jens Jakob Thune; Lars Køber; Eric Velazquez; John J V McMurray; Marc A Pfeffer; Robert Califf; Robert A Levine; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Pleiotropic effects of cardiac drugs on healing post-MI. The good, bad, and ugly.

Authors:  Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Use of Angiotensin receptor blockers in cardiovascular protection: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Mark A Munger
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-01

Review 5.  The Role for Cardiovascular Remodeling in Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  Nishant Krishna Sekaran; Anna Lisa Crowley; Fernanda Rodrigues de Souza; Elmiro Santos Resende; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Left ventricular ejection fraction as therapeutic target: is it the ideal marker?

Authors:  V Katsi; G Georgiopoulos; A Laina; E Koutli; J Parissis; C Tsioufis; P Nihoyannopoulos; D Tousoulis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  RAS blockade with ARB and ACE inhibitors: current perspective on rationale and patient selection.

Authors:  Christian Werner; Magnus Baumhäkel; Koon K Teo; Roland Schmieder; Johannes Mann; Thomas Unger; Salim Yusuf; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Effect of Losartan on Mitral Valve Changes After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Philipp E Bartko; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; J Luis Guerrero; Jonathan Beaudoin; Catherine Szymanski; Dae-Hee Kim; Margo M Seybolt; Mark D Handschumacher; Suzanne Sullivan; Michael L Garcia; James S Titus; Jill Wylie-Sears; Whitney S Irvin; Emmanuel Messas; Albert A Hagège; Alain Carpentier; Elena Aikawa; Joyce Bischoff; Robert A Levine
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  A new surgical ventricular restoration technique to reset residual myocardium's fiber orientation: the "KISS" procedure.

Authors:  Marco Cirillo
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-06-23

10.  Incidence, determinants, and prognostic value of reverse left ventricular remodelling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Acute Myocardial Infarction Contrast Imaging (AMICI) multicenter study.

Authors:  Stefania Funaro; Giuseppe La Torre; Mariapina Madonna; Leonarda Galiuto; Antonio Scarà; Alessandra Labbadia; Emanuele Canali; Antonella Mattatelli; Francesco Fedele; Francesco Alessandrini; Filippo Crea; Luciano Agati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.