Literature DB >> 23047885

Adolescent and adult perceptions of traditional and novel smokeless tobacco products and packaging in rural Ohio.

Sherry T Liu1, Julianna M Nemeth, Elizabeth G Klein, Amy K Ferketich, Mei-Po Kwan, Mary Ellen Wewers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As smokeless tobacco (ST) marketing increases and new products emerge on the market, very little is known about consumer perceptions of ST products. To inform development of future ST counter-marketing approaches, this qualitative study examined consumer perceptions of traditional and novel ST products and packaging.
METHODS: Focus groups and qualitative interviews were held with adolescent (n=23; mean age of 17 years) and adult (n=38; mean age of 29 years) male ST users from rural Ohio counties. Participants were shown a variety of traditional (eg, Copenhagen, Timber Wolf) and novel (eg, Camel Snus, Orbs) ST products and asked about perceptions of these products and their packaging. Transcriptions were coded independently for common themes by two individuals.
FINDINGS: Adolescents and adults generally had similar beliefs and reactions about ST products. While participants were familiar with a variety of traditional ST products, Copenhagen was the most frequently used product. Perceptions of quality and price of traditional products were closely tied to product taste and packaging material. Colours, design and size of ST packaging appealed to participants and influenced decisions to purchase. Adults believed novel ST products had a weak taste and were targeted at untraditional ST users. While the vast majority was unfamiliar with dissolvable tobacco, adolescents noted that they would be more convenient to use during school than traditional ST.
CONCLUSIONS: Packaging has a significant role in shaping perceptions of ST and consumer behaviour. Regulation of product packaging such as shape, size and images should be part of comprehensive tobacco control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advertising and Promotion; Non-cigarette tobacco products; Packaging and Labelling

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047885      PMCID: PMC4491921          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  13 in total

1.  Young people's perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: an online survey.

Authors:  Crawford Moodie; Allison Ford; Anne Marie Mackintosh; Gerard Hastings
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Smokeless tobacco marketing and sales practices in Appalachian Ohio following federal regulations.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Klein; Amy K Ferketich; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Mei-Po Kwan; Loren Kenda; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Test marketing of new smokeless tobacco products in four U.S. cities.

Authors:  John D Rogers; Lois Biener; Pamela I Clark
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Karen Bogen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Trends in smokeless tobacco use among adults and adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Paul Mowery; Scott Tomar; Stephen Marcus; Gary Giovino; Luhua Zhao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Tobacco use and exposure in rural areas: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Mark W Vander Weg; Cassie L Cunningham; M Bryant Howren; Xueya Cai
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Tobacco industry consumer research on smokeless tobacco users and product development.

Authors:  Adrienne B Mejia; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  New and traditional smokeless tobacco: comparison of toxicant and carcinogen levels.

Authors:  Irina Stepanov; Joni Jensen; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Retail promotions and perceptions of R.J. Reynolds' novel dissolvable tobacco in a US test market.

Authors:  Laura M Romito; M Kim Saxton; Lorinda L Coan; Arden G Christen
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2011-05-15

10.  How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.

Authors:  M A Wakefield; D Germain; S J Durkin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluating Point of Sale Tobacco Marketing Using Behavioral Laboratory Methods.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; David J Drobes; Thomas H Brandon; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

2.  Acute effects of snus in never-tobacco users: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jenny E Ozga; Nicholas J Felicione; Daniel Elswick; Melissa D Blank
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  A qualitative study of smokers' responses to messages discouraging dual tobacco product use.

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Ganna Kostygina; Nicolas M Sheon; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-01-17

4.  The Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Markets in Texas Relative to the United States.

Authors:  Erin J Miller Lo; Daniel P Giovenco; Olivia A Wackowski; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Scaring the snus out of smokers: testing effects of fear, threat, and efficacy on smokers' acceptance of novel smokeless tobacco products.

Authors:  Lucy Popova
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-12-20

6.  ST product characteristics and relationships with perceptions and behaviors among rural adolescent males: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Couch; Ellen F Darius; Margaret M Walsh; Benjamin W Chaffee
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2017-12-01

7.  Association of smokeless tobacco use and smoking in adolescents in the United States: an analysis of data from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey, 2011.

Authors:  R Constance Wiener
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Reasons for using flavored liquids among electronic cigarette users: A concept mapping study.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Alexa A Lopez; Mignonne C Guy; Caroline O Cobb
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Does Size Impact Attention and Recall of Graphic Health Warnings?

Authors:  Elizabeth G Klein; Abigail B Shoben; Sarah Krygowski; Amy Ferketich; Micah Berman; Ellen Peters; Unnava Rao; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  Characteristics of the Tobacco User Adult Cohort in Urban and Rural Ohio.

Authors:  Theodore M Brasky; Alice Hinton; Nathan J Doogan; Sarah E Cooper; Haikady N Nagaraja; Wenna Xi; Peter G Shields; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.