Literature DB >> 19564175

Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market.

Lois Biener1, Karen Bogen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The two largest U.S. cigarette manufacturers introduced Swedish-style low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco (snus) to several U.S. test markets in summer 2006. Since then, snus brands and test markets have proliferated.
METHODS: This article assesses consumer response by analyzing data from the 2006 and 2007 Indiana Adult Tobacco Survey (IATS), a statewide telephone survey of 3,544 adults. During those years, the IATS included questions on awareness and trial of Camel Snus and Taboka. Analyses examined rates and predictors of awareness and trial statewide, and within the central Indiana test market.
RESULTS: Nineteen percent of Indiana adults were aware of either Taboka or Camel Snus in 2006 and 2007. Estimates are larger (29%) for central Indiana and larger still (70%) for central Indiana smokers. Trial of snus, however, was very low (1.5% statewide), except among male smokers in central Indiana, 20% of whom are estimated to have tried it. Multivariate analyses showed that trial was more likely among men than women (odds ratio [OR] 13.85), residents of central Indiana than those farther from Indianapolis (OR 2.96), recipients than nonrecipients of tobacco promotions (OR 6.08), and those believing that smokeless tobacco is less harmful than cigarettes compared with those who believe it is equally or more harmful (OR 3.86). DISCUSSION: Results from this study suggest substantial initial interest in the new products among male smokers in this test market, especially those who receive promotional mailings from tobacco companies, which often include coupons for free or discounted products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19564175      PMCID: PMC2746834          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  14 in total

1.  The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts.

Authors:  David T Levy; Elizabeth A Mumford; K Michael Cummings; Elizabeth A Gilpin; Gary Giovino; Andrew Hyland; David Sweanor; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  "Not safe" is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; B Q Edwards
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Smokers' beliefs about the relative safety of other tobacco products: findings from the ITC collaboration.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Ann McNeill; Ron Borland; David Hammond; Bill King; Christian Boudreau; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Trends in smokeless tobacco use among adults and adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Paul Mowery; Scott Tomar; Stephen Marcus; Gary Giovino; Luhua Zhao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden.

Authors:  J Foulds; L Ramstrom; M Burke; K Fagerström
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  European Union policy on smokeless tobacco: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health.

Authors:  C Bates; K Fagerström; M J Jarvis; M Kunze; A McNeill; L Ramström
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Juhua Luo; Weimin Ye; Kazem Zendehdel; Johanna Adami; Hans-Olov Adami; Paolo Boffetta; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Epidemiologic perspectives on smokeless tobacco marketing and population harm.

Authors:  Scott L Tomar
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Exposure to nicotine and a tobacco-specific carcinogen increase with duration of use of smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  S S Hecht; S G Carmella; A Edmonds; S E Murphy; I Stepanov; X Luo; D K Hatsukami
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US.

Authors:  Mitchell Zeller; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  36 in total

1.  Smokers' perceptions of risks and harm from snus relative to cigarettes: A latent profile analysis study.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Anne E Ray; Jerod L Stapleton
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  The Effect of Comparatively-Framed versus Similarity-Framed E-Cigarette and Snus Print Ads on Young Adults' Ad and Product Perceptions.

Authors:  Smita C Banerjee; Kathryn Greene; Yuelin Li; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-07

3.  The Experimental Tobacco Marketplace II: Substitutability and sex effects in dual electronic cigarette and conventional cigarette users.

Authors:  Amanda J Quisenberry; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  The Impact of Health Warning Labels for Swedish Snus Advertisements on Young Adults' Snus Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Meghan B Moran; David T Levy; Raymond S Niaura
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Naturalistic assessment of demand for cigarettes, snus, and nicotine gum.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; A George Wilson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Michael C Judd; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Validation of self-reported smokeless tobacco use by measurement of serum cotinine concentration among US adults.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Brian A King
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Perceived Health Risks of Snus and Medicinal Nicotine Products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; R I Vogel; Herb H Severson; Joni A Jensen; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Interviews with smokers about smokeless tobacco products, risk messages and news articles.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Snus use and rejection in the USA.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Anthony M Roman; Scott A Mc Inerney; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Dororthy K Hatsukami; Alexandra Loukas; Richard J O'Connor; Laura Romito
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  A longitudinal, naturalistic study of U.S. smokers' trial and adoption of snus.

Authors:  Jessica L Burris; Amy E Wahlquist; Anthony J Alberg; K Michael Cummings; Kevin M Gray; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.