Theodore M Brasky1, Alice Hinton2, Nathan J Doogan3, Sarah E Cooper4, Haikady N Nagaraja5, Wenna Xi6, Peter G Shields7, Mary Ellen Wewers7. 1. Assistant Professor, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH. 2. Clinical Research Data Manager, The Ohio State University Center of Excellence in Regulatory Tobacco Science, Columbus, OH. 3. Post-doctoral Fellow, The Ohio State University Center of Excellence in Regulatory Tobacco Science, Columbus, OH. 4. Program Manager, The Ohio State University Center of Excellence in Regulatory Tobacco Science, Columbus, OH. 5. Professor, Division of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH. 6. Research Associate, Division of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH. 7. Professor, The Ohio State University Center of Excellence in Regulatory Tobacco Science, Columbus, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Identifying characteristics associated with the use of new and emerging tobacco products is a priority. The enumeration and baseline characteristics of a new cohort of adult tobacco users are described. METHODS: Residents, ≥18 years of age, in urban Franklin County, or one of 6 rural Appalachian counties, and who were exclusive users of combustible, smokeless (SLT), or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) tobacco products, or were dual users, were targeted for recruitment. Participants were interviewed in-person at baseline on sociodemographic characteristics, tobacco product use, and cognitive/affective and purchasing factors. RESULTS: We recruited 1210 participants (urban, N = 595; rural, N = 615). Urban participants were less likely to use tobacco daily, began using tobacco later, used tobacco for less time, and had higher cessation interest. ENDS users were significantly less likely to have made a quit attempt than users of other tobacco products. Duration of tobacco use and nicotine dependence also differed by product type. CONCLUSION: This cohort's enumeration allowed us to compare factors associated with tobacco product preferences and the use of novel products. The inclusion of rural Appalachia-a region with high tobacco use and disease burden-may provide additional insights into the implementation of tobacco control interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Identifying characteristics associated with the use of new and emerging tobacco products is a priority. The enumeration and baseline characteristics of a new cohort of adult tobacco users are described. METHODS: Residents, ≥18 years of age, in urban Franklin County, or one of 6 rural Appalachian counties, and who were exclusive users of combustible, smokeless (SLT), or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) tobacco products, or were dual users, were targeted for recruitment. Participants were interviewed in-person at baseline on sociodemographic characteristics, tobacco product use, and cognitive/affective and purchasing factors. RESULTS: We recruited 1210 participants (urban, N = 595; rural, N = 615). Urban participants were less likely to use tobacco daily, began using tobacco later, used tobacco for less time, and had higher cessation interest. ENDS users were significantly less likely to have made a quit attempt than users of other tobacco products. Duration of tobacco use and nicotine dependence also differed by product type. CONCLUSION: This cohort's enumeration allowed us to compare factors associated with tobacco product preferences and the use of novel products. The inclusion of rural Appalachia-a region with high tobacco use and disease burden-may provide additional insights into the implementation of tobacco control interventions.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jennifer Cullen; Paul Mowery; Cristine Delnevo; Jane A Allen; Natasha Sokol; M Justin Byron; Amber Thornton-Bullock Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Karin A Kasza; Bridget K Ambrose; Kevin P Conway; Nicolette Borek; Kristie Taylor; Maciej L Goniewicz; K Michael Cummings; Eva Sharma; Jennifer L Pearson; Victoria R Green; Annette R Kaufman; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Mark J Travers; Jonathan Kwan; Cindy Tworek; Yu-Ching Cheng; Ling Yang; Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej; Dana M van Bemmel; Cathy L Backinger; Wilson M Compton; Andrew J Hyland Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lianqi Liu; Steven Edland; Mark G Myers; C Richard Hofstetter; Wael K Al-Delaimy Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Benjamin T Kopp; Alice Hinton; Rong Lu; Sarah Cooper; Haikady Nagaraja; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Allison N Kurti; Marissa Palmer; Jennifer W Tidey; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Maria R Cooper; Nicolle M Krebs; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Joy L Hart; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Laura Sweet; Theodore M Brasky; Sarah Cooper; Nathan Doogan; Alice Hinton; Elizabeth G Klein; Haikady Nagaraja; Amanda Quisenberry; Wenna Xi; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nicholas J Felicione; Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Stuart G Ferguson; Geri Dino; Summer Kuhn; Ilana Haliwa; Melissa D Blank Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 7.552