Literature DB >> 21492157

Enhancing response rates in physician surveys: the limited utility of electronic options.

Keith Nicholls1, Kathryn Chapman, Thomas Shaw, Allen Perkins, Margaret Murray Sullivan, Susan Crutchfield, Eddie Reed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of offering physicians electronic options as alternatives to completing mail questionnaires. DATA SOURCE: A survey of colorectal cancer screening practices of Alabama primary care physicians, conducted May-June 2010. STUDY
DESIGN: In the follow-up to a mail questionnaire, physicians were offered options of completing surveys by telephone, fax, email, or online. DATA COLLECTION
METHOD: Detailed records were kept on the timing and mode of completion of surveys. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Eighty-eight percent of surveys were returned by mail, 10 percent were returned by fax, and only 2 percent were completed online; none were completed by telephone or email.
CONCLUSIONS: Offering fax options increases response rates, but providing other electronic options does not. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492157      PMCID: PMC3207199          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01261.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  7 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Surveying physicians: do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?

Authors:  Terry S Field; Cynthia A Cadoret; Martin L Brown; Marvella Ford; Sarah M Greene; Deanna Hill; Mark C Hornbrook; Richard T Meenan; Mary Jo White; Jane M Zapka
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Radiation safety among cardiology fellows.

Authors:  Candice Kim; Samip Vasaiwala; Faizul Haque; Kiran Pratap; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan B VanGeest; Timothy P Johnson; Verna L Welch
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Laura Quigley; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).

Authors:  Pam Leece; Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Marc F Swiontkowski; Emil H Schemitsch; Paul Tornetta; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total
  20 in total

1.  Physician perspectives on colorectal cancer surveillance care in a changing environment.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Katherine R Sterba; Nancy LaPelle; Kent Armeson; Dana R Burshell; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias.

Authors:  Jonathon R B Halbesleben; Marilyn V Whitman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Health Care Transition in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Perspectives of Adult Endocrinologists in the U.S.

Authors:  Katharine C Garvey; Gabriela H Telo; Joseph S Needleman; Peter Forbes; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Lori M Laffel
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Prevalence of Barriers and Facilitators to Enhancing Conservative Kidney Management for Older Adults in the Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Helen Tam-Tham; Kathryn M King-Shier; Chandra M Thomas; Robert R Quinn; Karen Fruetel; Sara N Davison; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Brief Report: Informing Strategies to Build PrEP Capacity Among San Francisco Bay Area Clinicians.

Authors:  Oliver Bacon; Rafael Gonzalez; Erin Andrew; Michael B Potter; James R Iñiguez; Stephanie E Cohen; Albert Y Liu; Jonathan D Fuchs
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Exploring resident perceptions of initial competency based medical education implementation.

Authors:  Shivani Upadhyaya; Marghalara Rashid; Andrea Davila-Cervantes; Anna Oswald
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey.

Authors:  Peter W Rose; Greg Rubin; Rafael Perera-Salazar; Sigrun Saur Almberg; Andriana Barisic; Martin Dawes; Eva Grunfeld; Nigel Hart; Richard D Neal; Marie Pirotta; Jeffrey Sisler; Gerald Konrad; Berit Skjødeberg Toftegaard; Hans Thulesius; Peter Vedsted; Jane Young; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Integrated working between residential care homes and primary care: a survey of care homes in England.

Authors:  Heather Gage; Angela Dickinson; Christina Victor; Peter Williams; Jerome Cheynel; Sue L Davies; Steve Iliffe; Katherine Froggatt; Wendy Martin; Claire Goodman
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Christiane Spitzmueller; Nancy J Petersen; Mona K Sawhney; Michael W Smith; Daniel R Murphy; Donna Espadas; Archana Laxmisan; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Cristi L O'Connor; Bryan Lau; Scott D Halpern; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.