Literature DB >> 9101691

The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study.

A Deehan1, L Templeton, C Taylor, C Drummond, J Strang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low response rates are acknowledged as a potential source of bias in survey results. Response rates are a particular problem in surveys of GPs. Thus, the methods used to encourage response to mailed surveys and the influence of inducements in maximizing response rates are fundamental issues to be examined when addressing the problem of response bias. AIM: To increase the overall response rate to a national study of GPs and to explore the effects of financial and non-financial inducements on response rates.
METHODS: Two mailing waves of a postal questionnaire to a 20% random sample of all GPs in England and Wales had achieved a 33% response rate. For the third mailing wave, the non-responding GPs were then divided into a control group, a group who were offered a donation to charity to complete the questionnaire and a group who were offered cash. The charity and cash groups were further subdivided into 5 pounds and 10 pounds groups to assess the effect of the size of the inducement offered. For the control group, a fourth wave was sent the offer of a 5 pounds or 10 pounds incentive.
RESULTS: Response was positively affected by the offer of an inducement. Cash, however, had a more substantial effect than the offer of a donation to charity. Older GPs were less likely to participate overall, whereas male GPs were more likely to respond to a cash inducement. Doctors who had seen more patients were less likely to reply earlier and were more likely to respond to the offer of cash.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care is going through many changes, some of which have increased the workload of the GP. It may now be that, to achieve the response rates needed to validate policy-related research, the offer of inducements will become a necessary part of the research process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9101691      PMCID: PMC1312912     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  3 in total

1.  Response bias in a study of general practice.

Authors:  J Cockburn; E Campbell; J J Gordon; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961-77.

Authors:  A Cartwright
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-11-18

3.  Workload of general practitioners before and after the new contract.

Authors:  D Hannay; T Usherwood; M Platts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-07
  3 in total
  24 in total

1.  When to use web-based surveys.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Clinical trials in primary care: targeted payments for trials might help improve recruitment and quality.

Authors:  R Foy; J Parry; B McAvoy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

4.  'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys.

Authors:  E F Kaner; C A Haighton; B R McAvoy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Effect of timed incentives on subject participation in a study of long-term breast cancer survivors: are there ethnic differences?

Authors:  K Ashing-Giwa; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias.

Authors:  Jonathon R B Halbesleben; Marilyn V Whitman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Beliefs and attitudes of French family practitioners toward depression: the impact of training in mental health.

Authors:  Joanna L Norton; Christelle Pommié; Joël Cogneau; Mark Haddad; Karen A Ritchie; Anthony H Mann
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.210

8.  The pharmacovigilance of pantoprazole: the results of postmarketing surveillance on 11 541 patients in England.

Authors:  Lynda V Wilton; Cheryl Key; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.

Authors:  Inese Grava-Gubins; Sarah Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Safety profile of celecoxib as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.

Authors:  Deborah Layton; Lynda V Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.