Literature DB >> 21492159

Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys.

Scott D Halpern1, Rachel Kohn, Aaron Dornbrand-Lo, Thomas Metkus, David A Asch, Kevin G Volpp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of lottery-based and fixed incentives on clinicians' response to surveys. DATA SOURCES: Three randomized trials with fixed payments and actuarially equivalent lotteries. STUDY
DESIGN: Trial 1 compared a low-probability/high-payout lottery, a high-probability/low-payout lottery, and no incentive. Trial 2 compared a moderate-probability/moderate-payout lottery with an unconditional fixed payment (payment sent with questionnaire). Trial 3 compared a moderate-probability/moderate-payout lottery with a conditional fixed payment (payment promised following response). PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Neither the low-probability nor high-probability lotteries improved response compared with no incentive. Unconditional fixed payments produced significantly greater response than actuarially equivalent lotteries, but conditional fixed payments did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Lottery-based incentives do not improve clinicians' response rates compared with no incentives, and they are inferior to unconditional fixed payments. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21492159      PMCID： PMC3207198          DOI： 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN： 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires.

Authors:  S M Cummings; L A Savitz; T R Konrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effects of cash and lottery incentives on mailed surveys to physicians: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gabriel M Leung; Lai Ming Ho; Moon Fai Chan; Janice M M Johnston; Fung Kam Wong
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Commentary: Improving response rates to mailed surveys: what do we learn from randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; David A Asch
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Peter A Ubel; Jesse A Berlin; David A Asch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses.

Authors:  B C Choi; A W Pak; J T Purdham
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians.

Authors:  Gabriel M Leung; Janice M Johnston; Hnin Saing; Keith Y K Tin; Irene O L Wong; Lai-Ming Ho
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias.

Authors:  M Schweitzer; D A Asch
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Different response rates in a trial of two envelop styles in mail survey research.

Authors:  D A Asch; N A Christakis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

Authors:  D A Asch; M K Jedrziewski; N A Christakis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients.

Authors:  Kevin G Volpp; Mark V Pauly; George Loewenstein; David Bangsberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301
View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Elements of Program Design in Medicare's Value-based and Alternative Payment Models: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt Maddox; Aditi P Sen; Lok Wong Samson; Rachael B Zuckerman; Nancy DeLew; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias.

Authors:  Jonathon R B Halbesleben; Marilyn V Whitman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Diffusion of Evidence-based Intensive Care Unit Organizational Practices. A State-Wide Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Kohn; Vanessa Madden; Jeremy M Kahn; David A Asch; Amber E Barnato; Scott D Halpern; Meeta Prasad Kerlin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-02

4.  Quality Health Care for Homeless Children: Achieving the AAP Recommendations for Care of Homeless Children and Youth.

Authors:  Avik Chatterjee; Marvin So; Spencer Dunleavy; Emily Oken
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2017

5.  Rule of rescue or the good of the many? An analysis of physicians' and nurses' preferences for allocating ICU beds.

Authors:  Rachel Kohn; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mitchell M Levy; Peter A Ubel; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Use of Insurance Against a Small Loss as an Incentive Strategy.

Authors:  Daniella Meeker; Christin Thompson; Greg Strylewicz; Tara K Knight; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Decis Anal       Date:  2015-04-10

Review 7.  Addressing sleep disturbances: an opportunity to prevent cardiometabolic disease?

Authors:  Michael A Grandner
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04

8.  Estimating ICU Benefit: A Randomized Study of Physicians.

Authors:  Thomas S Valley; Andrew J Admon; Darin B Zahuranec; Allan Garland; Angela Fagerlin; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Effect of Small Monetary Incentive and Demographic Characteristics on Response Rate of Self-Administered Questionnaire Mailed to Rural Women.

Authors:  Lacey A McCormack
Journal:  Online J Rural Res Policy       Date:  2013

10.  The effect of two lottery-style incentives on response rates to postal questionnaires in a prospective cohort study in preschool children at high risk of asthma: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Lonneke B van der Mark; Karina E van Wonderen; Jacob Mohrs; Patrick Je Bindels; Milo A Puhan; Gerben Ter Riet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.615
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.