Literature DB >> 11425128

A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity.

R Meddis1, L P O'Mard, E A Lopez-Poveda.   

Abstract

Computational algorithms that mimic the response of the basilar membrane must be capable of reproducing a range of complex features that are characteristic of the animal observations. These include complex input output functions that are nonlinear near the site's best frequency, but linear elsewhere. This nonlinearity is critical when using the output of the algorithm as the input to models of inner hair cell function and subsequent auditory-nerve models of low- and high-spontaneous rate fibers. We present an algorithm that uses two processing units operating in parallel: one linear and the other compressively nonlinear. The output from the algorithm is the sum of the outputs of the linear and nonlinear processing units. Input to the algorithm is stapes motion and output represents basilar membrane motion. The algorithm is evaluated against published chinchilla and guinea pig observations of basilar membrane and Reissner's membrane motion made using laser velocimetry. The algorithm simulates both quantitatively and qualitatively, differences in input/output functions among three different sites along the cochlear partition. It also simulates quantitatively and qualitatively a range of phenomena including isovelocity functions, phase response, two-tone suppression, impulse response, and distortion products. The algorithm is potentially suitable for development as a bank of filters, for use in more comprehensive models of the peripheral auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425128     DOI: 10.1121/1.1370357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Improving the dynamics of responses to amplitude modulated stimuli by modeling inhibitory interneurons in cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Pierre Dugué; Régine Le Bouquin Jeannès; Gérard Faucon
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Mode-locked spike trains in responses of ventral cochlear nucleus chopper and onset neurons to periodic stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan Laudanski; Stephen Coombes; Alan R Palmer; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Multidimensional stimulus encoding in the auditory nerve of the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Jacob L Wydick; Christine Köppl; José L Peña
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

9.  Measurements of wide-band cochlear reflectance in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-12

10.  Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.