Literature DB >> 11785812

A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank.

E A Lopez-Poveda1, R Meddis.   

Abstract

Some published cochlear filterbanks are nonlinear but are fitted to animal basilar membrane (BM) responses. Others, like the gammatone, are based on human psychophysical data, but are linear. In this article, a human nonlinear filterbank is constructed by adapting a computational model of animal BM physiology to simulate human BM nonlinearity as measured by psychophysical pulsation-threshold experiments. The approach is based on a dual-resonance nonlinear type of filter whose basic structure was modeled using animal observations. In modeling the pulsation threshold data, the main assumption is that pulsation threshold occurs when the signal and the masker produce comparable excitation, that is the same filter output, at the place of the BM best tuned to the signal frequency. The filter is fitted at a discrete number of best frequencies (BFs) for which psychophysical data are available for a single listener and for an average response of six listeners. The filterbank is then created by linear regression of the resulting parameters to intermediate BFs. The strengths and limitations of the resulting filterbank are discussed. Its suitability for simulating hearing-impaired cochlear responses is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11785812     DOI: 10.1121/1.1416197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  A modeling study of the responses of the lateral superior olive to ipsilateral sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Le Wang; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

7.  Idealized computational models for auditory receptive fields.

Authors:  Tony Lindeberg; Anders Friberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Dora Del Pilar Sturla-Carreto; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural time differences at high modulation rates by introducing temporal jitter.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The frequency following response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Anahita Mehta; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.