Literature DB >> 18247774

Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.

Hanjun Liu1, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the responsiveness of the pitch-shift reflex to small magnitude stimuli and voice fundamental frequency (F(0)) level. English speakers received pitch-shifted voice feedback (+/-10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 cents, 200 ms duration) during vowel phonations at a high and a low F(0) level. Mean pitch-shift response magnitude increased as a function of pitch-shift stimulus magnitude, but when expressed as a percent of stimulus magnitude, declined from 100% with +/-10 cents to 37% with +/-50 cents stimuli. Response magnitudes were larger and latencies were shorter with a high F(0) level (16 cents;130 ms) compared to a low F(0) level (13 cents;152 ms). Data from the present study demonstrate that vocal response magnitudes are equal to small perturbation magnitudes, and they are larger and faster with a high F(0) voice. These results suggest that the audio-vocal system is optimally suited for compensating for small pitch rather than larger perturbations. Data also suggest the sensitivity of the audio-vocal system to voice perturbation may vary with F(0) level.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18247774     DOI: 10.1121/1.2800254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  50 in total

1.  Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures.

Authors:  Jeff Berry; Maura Moyle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Voice fundamental frequency modulates vocal response to pitch perturbations during English speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; James Auger; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Laryngeal electromyographic responses to perturbations in voice pitch auditory feedback.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Michel Bove; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Nicole M Russo; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Robyn Goldberg; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory Feedback Control Mechanisms Do Not Contribute to Cortical Hyperactivity Within the Voice Production Network in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Anne J Blood; James Burns; J Pieter Noordzij; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Audio-vocal system regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Charles Larson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.