Literature DB >> 29696312

Neural bases of sensorimotor adaptation in the vocal motor system.

Roozbeh Behroozmand1, Stacey Sangtian2.   

Abstract

The present study used event-related potential (ERP) recordings to investigate the neural mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in response to altered auditory feedback (AAF) during vocal production. 12 healthy speakers were tested under a vocal motor adaptation paradigm in which the fundamental frequency (F0) of their voice auditory feedback was pitch-shifted downward by one semi-tone (- 100 cents) during vowel vocalizations. Behavioral results revealed that subjects adapted to AAF by producing opposing (upward) responses to pitch-shift stimuli, and this adaptive behavior persisted after feedback alteration was removed (washout). We found that adaptation to AAF was accompanied by a significant increase in the amplitude of a parietal ERP activity elicited after the onset of vocalization. However, no such effect was observed for pre-motor ERPs elicited before vocalization onset. Moreover, we found that adaptive vocal responses were negatively correlated with ERPs over the parietal and positively correlated with those over the fronto-central areas after vocalization onset. These findings suggest that vocal motor adaptation is mediated by sensorimotor reprogramming of feedforward motor commands through incorporating auditory feedback, which is indexed by modulation of behavioral and ERP responses to AAF. We suggest that modulation of neural activities in the parietal cortex highlights its significance as a neural interface for sensorimotor integration and indicates its critical role in vocal motor adaptation. Our findings support the notion that the parietal mechanisms are involved in driving adaptive motor behavior to cope with unexpected changes in the sensory environment to accomplish communication goals during vocal production and motor control.

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; ERP; Pitch-shift stimulus; Sensorimotor adaptation; Voice motor control

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696312     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5272-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

Review 1.  Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui; M Esslen; K Kochi; D Lehmann
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002

2.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing.

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Redistribution of neural phase coherence reflects establishment of feedforward map in speech motor adaptation.

Authors:  Ranit Sengupta; Sazzad M Nasir
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Plasticity in the human speech motor system drives changes in speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Emily Neufeld; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impaired Feedforward Control and Enhanced Feedback Control of Speech in Patients with Cerebellar Degeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Zarinah Agnew; Srikantan Nagarajan; John Houde; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Vocal responses to perturbations in voice auditory feedback in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Leo Verhagen Metman; Charles R Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech.

Authors:  Nicolas J Bourguignon; Shari R Baum; Douglas M Shiller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cerebellar contribution to auditory feedback control of speech production: Evidence from patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Jiajun Zhuang; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Zhiqin Xu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation over right somatosensory larynx cortex enhances vocal pitch-regulation in nonsingers.

Authors:  Sebastian Finkel; Ralf Veit; Martin Lotze; Anders Friberg; Peter Vuust; Surjo Soekadar; Niels Birbaumer; Boris Kleber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Voice Onset Time in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: Evidence for Disordered Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Jennifer A Hylkema; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Topological signal processing and inference of event-related potential response.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Lorelei Phillip Johnson; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Differential contributions of the two cerebral hemispheres to temporal and spectral speech feedback control.

Authors:  Mareike Floegel; Susanne Fuchs; Christian A Kell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Alexandre Lehmann; Mickael L D Deroche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Speech compensation responses and sensorimotor adaptation to formant feedback perturbations.

Authors:  Inez Raharjo; Hardik Kothare; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.