Literature DB >> 10530022

Methods for estimating the sound pressure at the eardrum.

H Hudde1, A Engel, A Lodwig.   

Abstract

The problem of estimating the sound pressure generated at individual eardrums is systematically investigated. In audiometry, the reference to the pressure at the eardrum is usually realized by using a coupler such as the IEC 711 ear simulator, which is intended to approximate an average ear. The errors caused by individually shaped ear canals are calculated for a typical audiometric earphone (Beyer DT 48) in combination with the IEC 711 ear simulator and with an "ideal" coupler. These errors can reach 15 dB and are clearly more important than deviations of the ear simulator from an average ear. In order to obtain correct estimations, the chain matrices of individual ear canals have to be determined. Best estimates are obtained using the "reflectance phase method," but the "pressure minima method" also provides surprisingly good results, except in narrow frequency ranges. The reflectance phase method is checked using a physical model of the ear canal and the middle ear. The resulting errors of estimation remain within a limit of 3 dB up to more than 10 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530022     DOI: 10.1121/1.427945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.