Literature DB >> 19487714

Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures.

Nancy R Cook1, Paul M Ridker.   

Abstract

Models for risk prediction are widely used in clinical practice to stratify risk and assign treatment strategies. The contribution of new biomarkers has largely been based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, but this measure can be insensitive to important changes in absolute risk. Methods based on risk stratification have recently been proposed to compare predictive models. Such methods include the reclassification calibration statistic, the net reclassification improvement, and the integrated discrimination improvement. This article demonstrates the use of reclassification measures and illustrates their performance for well-known cardiovascular risk predictors in a cohort of women. These measures are targeted at evaluating the potential of new models and markers to change risk strata and alter treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487714      PMCID: PMC2782591          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

1.  Improving coronary heart disease risk assessment in asymptomatic people: role of traditional risk factors and noninvasive cardiovascular tests.

Authors:  P Greenland; S C Smith; S M Grundy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond' by M. J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929).

Authors:  M S Pepe; Z Feng; J W Gu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Julie E Buring; Nader Rifai; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; David Gordon; J Michael Gaziano; Joann E Manson; Charles H Hennekens; Julie E Buring
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical utility of different lipid measures for prediction of coronary heart disease in men and women.

Authors:  Erik Ingelsson; Ernst J Schaefer; John H Contois; Judith R McNamara; Lisa Sullivan; Michelle J Keyes; Michael J Pencina; Christopher Schoonmaker; Peter W F Wilson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  187 in total

1.  Multicenter validation of the diagnostic accuracy of a blood-based gene expression test for assessing obstructive coronary artery disease in nondiabetic patients.

Authors:  Steven Rosenberg; Michael R Elashoff; Philip Beineke; Susan E Daniels; James A Wingrove; Whittemore G Tingley; Philip T Sager; Amy J Sehnert; May Yau; William E Kraus; L Kristin Newby; Robert S Schwartz; Szilard Voros; Stephen G Ellis; Naeem Tahirkheli; Ron Waksman; John McPherson; Alexandra Lansky; Mary E Winn; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comment: Measures to summarize and compare the predictive capacity of markers.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Translating associations between common kidney diseases and genetic variation into the clinic.

Authors:  Paul E Drawz; John R Sedor
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 4.  Soluble biomarkers and morbidity and mortality among people infected with HIV: summary of published reports from 1997 to 2010.

Authors:  James D Neaton; Jacqueline Neuhaus; Sean Emery
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Measurement of carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque detection for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Authors:  Heather M Johnson; James H Stein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Diagnostic classification in patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis: physicians' judgement or a decision rule?

Authors:  Geert-Jan Geersing; Kristel J Janssen; Ruud Oudega; Henk van Weert; Henri Stoffers; Arno Hoes; Karel Moons
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Isaac S Kohane; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Preoperative Prognostic Prediction Nomogram in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Choi; Yun-Suhk Suh; Yunhee Choi; Jiyeon Han; Tae Han Kim; Shin-Hoo Park; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Multi-morbidity, dependency, and frailty singly or in combination have different impact on health outcomes.

Authors:  Jean Woo; Jason Leung
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2013-10-03

10.  Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; R Winzenrieth; J Tamaki; Y Sato; N Dongmei; E Kajita; K Kouda; A Yura; T Tachiki; K Kamiya; S Kagamimori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.