Literature DB >> 27525290

Neural responses to grammatically and lexically degraded speech.

Alexa Bautista1, Stephen M Wilson1.   

Abstract

Linguistic stimuli that are degraded in various ways have been used in neuroimaging studies to uncover distinct roles for different brain regions involved in processing language. In order to identify brain regions differentially involved in grammatical and lexical processing, we spectrally rotated specific morphemes and manipulated morpheme order to create speech stimuli that were degraded either grammatically or lexically, yet were matched in intelligibility. Twelve healthy participants were scanned with functional MRI as they listened to the grammatically and lexically degraded stimuli, interspersed with clear stimuli in the context of a familiar narrative. Contrary to our expectations, we did not find any brain regions that were selectively sensitive to grammatical or lexical degradation. However, compared to previous studies, there was less signal reduction than anticipated in response to degradation of either type. These findings may reflect increased attention to the degraded stimuli due to the familiar narrative context, since attention to degraded speech has been shown to attenuate the signal decreases typically associated with reduced intelligibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  degraded speech; fMRI; grammar; intelligibility; language comprehension; lexicon; narrative

Year:  2016        PMID: 27525290      PMCID: PMC4981484          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1123281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  34 in total

1.  Testing for anatomically specified regional effects.

Authors:  K J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia.

Authors:  Michael T Ullman; Roumyana Pancheva; Tracy Love; Eiling Yee; David Swinney; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Frank Eisner; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Ventral and dorsal pathways for language.

Authors:  Dorothee Saur; Björn W Kreher; Susanne Schnell; Dorothee Kümmerer; Philipp Kellmeyer; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Roza Umarova; Mariacristina Musso; Volkmar Glauche; Stefanie Abel; Walter Huber; Michel Rijntjes; Jürgen Hennig; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Visual inspection of independent components: defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data.

Authors:  Robert E Kelly; George S Alexopoulos; Zhishun Wang; Faith M Gunning; Christopher F Murphy; Sarah Shizuko Morimoto; Dora Kanellopoulos; Zhiru Jia; Kelvin O Lim; Matthew J Hoptman
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: a comparative neuropsychological study.

Authors:  J R Hodges; K Patterson
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Nina F Dronkers; Katherine P Rankin; Jennifer M Ogar; La Phengrasamy; Howard J Rosen; Julene K Johnson; Michael W Weiner; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  16 in total

1.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan A Blank
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew Siegelman; Idan A Blank; Zachary Mineroff; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan Asher Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Zachary Mineroff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-06-20

5.  Domain-General Brain Regions Do Not Track Linguistic Input as Closely as Language-Selective Regions.

Authors:  Idan A Blank; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  High-level language processing regions are not engaged in action observation or imitation.

Authors:  Brianna L Pritchett; Caitlyn Hoeflin; Kami Koldewyn; Eyal Dechter; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation.

Authors:  Evgeniia Diachek; Idan Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Josef Affourtit; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  An adaptive semantic matching paradigm for reliable and valid language mapping in individuals with aphasia.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Melodie Yen; Dana K Eriksson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Speech-accompanying gestures are not processed by the language-processing mechanisms.

Authors:  Olessia Jouravlev; David Zheng; Zuzanna Balewski; Alvince Le Arnz Pongos; Zena Levan; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Terri L Scott; Peter Brunner; William G Coon; Brianna Pritchett; Gerwin Schalk; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.