Literature DB >> 11747097

Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Thomas E Nichols1, Andrew P Holmes.   

Abstract

Requiring only minimal assumptions for validity, nonparametric permutation testing provides a flexible and intuitive methodology for the statistical analysis of data from functional neuroimaging experiments, at some computational expense. Introduced into the functional neuroimaging literature by Holmes et al. ([1996]: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16:7-22), the permutation approach readily accounts for the multiple comparisons problem implicit in the standard voxel-by-voxel hypothesis testing framework. When the appropriate assumptions hold, the nonparametric permutation approach gives results similar to those obtained from a comparable Statistical Parametric Mapping approach using a general linear model with multiple comparisons corrections derived from random field theory. For analyses with low degrees of freedom, such as single subject PET/SPECT experiments or multi-subject PET/SPECT or fMRI designs assessed for population effects, the nonparametric approach employing a locally pooled (smoothed) variance estimate can outperform the comparable Statistical Parametric Mapping approach. Thus, these nonparametric techniques can be used to verify the validity of less computationally expensive parametric approaches. Although the theory and relative advantages of permutation approaches have been discussed by various authors, there has been no accessible explication of the method, and no freely distributed software implementing it. Consequently, there have been few practical applications of the technique. This article, and the accompanying MATLAB software, attempts to address these issues. The standard nonparametric randomization and permutation testing ideas are developed at an accessible level, using practical examples from functional neuroimaging, and the extensions for multiple comparisons described. Three worked examples from PET and fMRI are presented, with discussion, and comparisons with standard parametric approaches made where appropriate. Practical considerations are given throughout, and relevant statistical concepts are expounded in appendices. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11747097      PMCID: PMC6871862          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  25 in total

1.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; J Suckling; S Overmeyer; S Rabe-Hesketh; E Taylor; M J Brammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Investigation of low frequency drift in fMRI signal.

Authors:  A M Smith; B K Lewis; U E Ruttimann; F Q Ye; T M Sinnwell; Y Yang; J H Duyn; J A Frank
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain.

Authors:  K J Worsley; A C Evans; S Marrett; P Neelin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Reliability of PET activation across statistical methods, subject groups, and sample sizes.

Authors:  T J Grabowski; R J Frank; C K Brown; H Damasio; L L Ponto; G L Watkins; R D Hichwa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Time series analysis in the time domain and resampling methods for studies of functional magnetic resonance brain imaging.

Authors:  J J Locascio; P J Jennings; C I Moore; S Corkin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold.

Authors:  S D Forman; J D Cohen; M Fitzgerald; W F Eddy; M A Mintun; D C Noll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited--again.

Authors:  K J Worsley; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis.

Authors:  E Bullmore; M Brammer; S C Williams; S Rabe-Hesketh; N Janot; A David; J Mellers; R Howard; P Sham
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.

Authors:  A P Holmes; R C Blair; J D Watson; I Ford
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Schizophrenia and cognitive dysmetria: a positron-emission tomography study of dysfunctional prefrontal-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry.

Authors:  N C Andreasen; D S O'Leary; T Cizadlo; S Arndt; K Rezai; L L Ponto; G L Watkins; R D Hichwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2000 in total

1.  Characterizing instantaneous phase relationships in whole-brain fMRI activation data.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; Baxter P Rogers; John D Carew; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Chad H Moritz; M Elizabeth Meyerand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Quantity determination and the distance effect with letters, numbers, and shapes: a functional MR imaging study of number processing.

Authors:  Robert K Fulbright; Stephanie C Manson; Pawel Skudlarski; Cheryl M Lacadie; John C Gore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Morphological changes in subregions of hippocampus and amygdala in major depressive disorder patients.

Authors:  Zhijun Yao; Yu Fu; Jianfeng Wu; Wenwen Zhang; Yue Yu; Zicheng Zhang; Xia Wu; Yalin Wang; Bin Hu
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  PET evidence for a role for striatal dopamine in the attentional blink: functional implications.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Rachel Tomer; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Lorenza S Colzato; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Influence of fatigue on hand muscle coordination and EMG-EMG coherence during three-digit grasping.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos Santos; Brach Poston; Mark Jesunathadas; Lisa R Bobich; Thomas M Hamm; Marco Santello
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Accelerating permutation testing in voxel-wise analysis through subspace tracking: A new plugin for SnPM.

Authors:  Felipe Gutierrez-Barragan; Vamsi K Ithapu; Chris Hinrichs; Camille Maumet; Sterling C Johnson; Thomas E Nichols; Vikas Singh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  How bilingualism protects the brain from aging: Insights from bimodal bilinguals.

Authors:  Le Li; Jubin Abutalebi; Karen Emmorey; Gaolang Gong; Xin Yan; Xiaoxia Feng; Lijuan Zou; Guosheng Ding
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The similarity structure of distributed neural responses reveals the multiple representations of letters.

Authors:  David Rothlein; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Automated 3D mapping of hippocampal atrophy and its clinical correlates in 400 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls.

Authors:  Jonathan H Morra; Zhuowen Tu; Liana G Apostolova; Amity E Green; Christina Avedissian; Sarah K Madsen; Neelroop Parikshak; Xue Hua; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Norbert Schuff; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Christian Grefkes; Ling E Wang; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.