Literature DB >> 22248574

Human auditory cortex is sensitive to the perceived clarity of speech.

Conor J Wild1, Matthew H Davis, Ingrid S Johnsrude.   

Abstract

Feedback connections among auditory cortical regions may play an important functional role in processing naturalistic speech, which is typically considered a problem solved through serial feed-forward processing stages. Here, we used fMRI to investigate whether activity within primary auditory cortex (PAC) is sensitive to the perceived clarity of degraded sentences. A region-of-interest analysis using probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps of PAC revealed a modulation of activity, in the most primary-like subregion (area Te1.0), related to the intelligibility of naturalistic speech stimuli that cannot be driven by stimulus differences. Importantly, this effect was unique to those conditions accompanied by a perceptual increase in clarity. Connectivity analyses suggested sources of input to PAC are higher-order temporal, frontal and motor regions. These findings are incompatible with feed-forward models of speech perception, and suggest that this problem belongs amongst modern perceptual frameworks in which the brain actively predicts sensory input, rather than just passively receiving it. Crown Copyright Â
© 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22248574     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  42 in total

1.  An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Megan Reilly; Carolina Santiago; Patryk Laurent; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Lori L Holt; Patryk Laurent; Sung-Joo Lim; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  An adaptive semantic matching paradigm for reliable and valid language mapping in individuals with aphasia.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Melodie Yen; Dana K Eriksson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Aberrant connectivity of areas for decoding degraded speech in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations.

Authors:  Mareike Clos; Kelly M J Diederen; Anne Lotte Meijering; Iris E Sommer; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus Sensitivity to Phonetic Competition in Receptive Language Processing: A Comparison of Clear and Conversational Speech.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Emily Myers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.