Literature DB >> 7326654

Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.

T F Baskett, R M McMillen.   

Abstract

A review of 1683 cesarean sections performed at one hospital in a 3-year period (1977-79) showed that the cesarean section rate had trebled since 1967-79, the rates being 16.9% and 5.8%. The main indications for cesarean section responsible for this rise were dystocia, breech presentation and a previous cesarean section. AFter the operation 23.3% of received antibiotics. If the cesarean section rate is to fall, the biggest impact can be made by planning vaginal delivery in selected patients with a previous cesarean section and by improving the management of nonprogressive labour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7326654      PMCID: PMC1862416     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  Cesarean section in present-day obstetrics. Presidential address.

Authors:  O H Jones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress.

Authors:  R W Zalar; E J Quilligan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Modern management of the breech delivery.

Authors:  L I Mann; J M Gallant
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section.

Authors:  M Moro; M Andrews
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Prophylactic cesarean section antibiotics: maternal and neonatal morbidity before or after cord clamping.

Authors:  H R Gordon; D Phelps; K Blanchard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  A simplified antepartum high-risk pregnancy scoring form: statistical analysis of 5459 cases.

Authors:  A T Coopland; L J Peddle; T F Baskett; R Rollwagen; A Simpson; E Parker
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-05-07       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Cesarean section: what is an acceptable rate?

Authors:  T F Baskett
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1978-05-06       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section.

Authors:  C E Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.190

9.  Modern indications for cesarean section.

Authors:  L I Mann; J Gallant
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-10-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Risk factors associated with post cesarean section febrile morbidity.

Authors:  S L Green; F A Sarubbi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton.

Authors:  P J Stewart; C Dulberg; A C Arnill; T Elmslie; P F Hall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Obstetrical anaesthesia at Winnipeg Women's Hospital 1975-83: anaesthetic techniques and complications.

Authors:  B Ong; M M Cohen; M Cumming; R J Palahniuk
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.

Authors:  Mrigesh Bhatia; Kajori Banerjee; Priyanka Dixit; Laxmi Kant Dwivedi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.