Literature DB >> 23015451

Perceptual learning reconfigures the effects of visual adaptation.

David P McGovern1, Neil W Roach, Ben S Webb.   

Abstract

Our sensory experiences over a range of different timescales shape our perception of the environment. Two particularly striking short-term forms of plasticity with manifestly different time courses and perceptual consequences are those caused by visual adaptation and perceptual learning. Although conventionally treated as distinct forms of experience-dependent plasticity, their neural mechanisms and perceptual consequences have become increasingly blurred, raising the possibility that they might interact. To optimize our chances of finding a functionally meaningful interaction between learning and adaptation, we examined in humans the perceptual consequences of learning a fine discrimination task while adapting the neurons that carry most information for performing this task. Learning improved discriminative accuracy to a level that ultimately surpassed that in an unadapted state. This remarkable improvement came at a price: adapting directions that before learning had little effect elevated discrimination thresholds afterward. The improvements in discriminative accuracy grew quickly and surpassed unadapted levels within the first few training sessions, whereas the deterioration in discriminative accuracy had a different time course. This learned reconfiguration of adapted discriminative accuracy occurred without a concomitant change to the characteristic perceptual biases induced by adaptation, suggesting that the system was still in an adapted state. Our results point to a functionally meaningful push-pull interaction between learning and adaptation in which a gain in sensitivity in one adapted state is balanced by a loss of sensitivity in other adapted states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015451      PMCID: PMC3492751          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1363-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination.

Authors:  C W Clifford; A M Wyatt; D H Arnold; S T Smith; P Wenderoth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex.

Authors:  Dezhe Z Jin; Valentin Dragoi; Mriganka Sur; H Sebastian Seung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effect of correlated variability on the accuracy of a population code.

Authors:  L F Abbott; P Dayan
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Spatial-frequency discrimination and detection: comparison of postadaptation thresholds.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1983-12

7.  Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose; Tianming Yang; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Fang Fang; Allen M Y Cheong; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Sleep-dependent learning: a nap is as good as a night.

Authors:  Sara Mednick; Ken Nakayama; Robert Stickgold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Perceptual learning in the absence of task or stimulus specificity.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Characterizing the effects of multidirectional motion adaptation.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Neil W Roach; Ben S Webb
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Contour inflections are adaptable features.

Authors:  Jason Bell; Sinthujaa Sampasivam; David P McGovern; Andrew Isaac Meso; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 4.  Moving sensory adaptation beyond suppressive effects in single neurons.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Improving self-motion perception and balance through roll tilt perceptual training.

Authors:  Andrew R Wagner; Megan J Kobel; Junichi Tajino; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Top-down inputs enhance orientation selectivity in neurons of the primary visual cortex during perceptual learning.

Authors:  Samat Moldakarimov; Maxim Bazhenov; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models.

Authors:  James J Bonaiuto; Archy de Berker; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Visual mode switching learned through repeated adaptation to color.

Authors:  Yanjun Li; Katherine Em Tregillus; Qiongsha Luo; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Brain correlates of experience-dependent changes in stimulus discrimination based on the amount and schedule of exposure.

Authors:  Matthew E Mundy; Paul E Downing; Robert C Honey; Krish D Singh; Kim S Graham; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Habituation of visual adaptation.

Authors:  Xue Dong; Yi Gao; Lili Lv; Min Bao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.