Literature DB >> 24893785

Contour inflections are adaptable features.

Jason Bell1, Sinthujaa Sampasivam2, David P McGovern3, Andrew Isaac Meso4, Frederick A A Kingdom5.   

Abstract

An object's shape is a strong cue for visual recognition. Most models of shape coding emphasize the role of oriented lines and curves for coding an object's shape. Yet inflection points, which occur at the junction of two oppositely signed curves, are ubiquitous features in natural scenes and carry important information about the shape of an object. Using a visual aftereffect in which the perceived shape of a contour is changed following prolonged viewing of a slightly different-shaped contour, we demonstrate a specific aftereffect for a contour inflection. Control conditions show that this aftereffect cannot be explained by adaptation to either the component curves or to the local orientation at the point of inflection. Further, we show that the aftereffect transfers weakly to a compound curve without an inflection, ruling out a general compound curvature detector as an explanation of our findings. We assume however that there are adaptable mechanisms for coding other specific forms of compound curves. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that the human visual system contains specific mechanisms for coding contour inflections, further highlighting their role in shape and object coding.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aftereffects; contour; curvature; inflection; shape

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24893785     DOI: 10.1167/14.7.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  56 in total

1.  Cortical pooling algorithms for judging global motion direction.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Space and time in visual context.

Authors:  Odelia Schwartz; Anne Hsu; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Barry Wark; Brian Nils Lundstrom; Adrienne Fairhall
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Relationship between adapted neural population responses in MT and motion adaptation in speed and direction of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long adaptation reveals mostly attractive shifts of orientation tuning in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  N Ghisovan; A Nemri; S Shumikhina; S Molotchnikoff
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Centre-surround effects on perceived orientation in complex images.

Authors:  Erin Goddard; Colin W G Clifford; Samuel G Solomon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Monkey and humans exhibit similar motion-processing mechanisms.

Authors:  William Curran; Catherine Lynn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Is the homunculus "aware" of sensory adaptation?

Authors:  Peggy Seriès; Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Timescales of inference in visual adaptation.

Authors:  Barry Wark; Adrienne Fairhall; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.