Literature DB >> 16135549

Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex.

Dezhe Z Jin1, Valentin Dragoi, Mriganka Sur, H Sebastian Seung.   

Abstract

The tilt aftereffect (TAE) is a visual illusion in which prolonged adaptation to an oriented stimulus causes shifts in subsequent perceived orientations. Historically, neural models of the TAE have explained it as the outcome of response suppression of neurons tuned to the adapting orientation. Recent physiological studies of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) have confirmed that such response suppression exists. However, it was also found that the preferred orientations of neurons shift away from the adapting orientation. Here we show that adding this second factor to a population coding model of V1 improves the correspondence between neurophysiological data and TAE measurements. According to our model, the shifts in preferred orientation have the opposite effect as response suppression, reducing the magnitude of the TAE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135549     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00571.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

1.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Jonas Larsson; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xianghui Chen; Min Gao; Qiong Yang; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Characterizing the effects of multidirectional motion adaptation.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Neil W Roach; Ben S Webb
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Independent effects of adaptation and attention on perceived speed.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Katrin Herrmann; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-14

7.  Investigating the mechanisms of hallucinogen-induced visions using 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA): a randomized controlled trial in humans.

Authors:  Matthew J Baggott; Jennifer D Siegrist; Gantt P Galloway; Lynn C Robertson; Jeremy R Coyle; John E Mendelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dissociable perceptual effects of visual adaptation.

Authors:  Kai-Markus Müller; Frieder Schillinger; David H Do; David A Leopold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Invariance in visual object recognition requires training: a computational argument.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.