Literature DB >> 25442850

Moving sensory adaptation beyond suppressive effects in single neurons.

Samuel G Solomon1, Adam Kohn2.   

Abstract

How an object is perceived depends on the temporal context in which it is encountered. Sensory signals in the brain also depend on temporal context, a phenomenon often referred to as adaptation. Traditional descriptions of adaptation effects emphasize various forms of response fatigue in single neurons, which grow in strength with exposure to a stimulus. Recent work on vision, and other sensory modalities, has shown that this description has substantial shortcomings. Here we review our emerging understanding of how adaptation alters the balance between excitatory and suppressive signals, how effects depend on adaptation duration, and how adaptation influences representations that are distributed within and across multiple brain structures. This work points to a sophisticated set of mechanisms for adjusting to recent sensory experience, and suggests new avenues for understanding their function.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442850      PMCID: PMC4279707          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  139 in total

1.  Dynamic modification of cortical orientation tuning mediated by recurrent connections.

Authors:  Gidon Felsen; Yao-song Shen; Haishan Yao; Gareth Spor; Chaoyi Li; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Mechanisms of direction selectivity in cat primary visual cortex as revealed by visual adaptation.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Ilan Lampl; David Ferster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Intensity-dependent adaptation of cortical and thalamic neurons is controlled by brainstem circuits of the sensory pathway.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Yonatan Katz; Ilan Lampl
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field.

Authors:  J Edwin Dickinson; Renita A Almeida; Jason Bell; David R Badcock
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Relationship between contrast adaptation and orientation tuning in V1 and V2 of cat visual cortex.

Authors:  N A Crowder; N S C Price; M A Hietanen; B Dreher; C W G Clifford; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Stephanie C Wissig; Bart Krekelberg; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Recent history of stimulus speeds affects the speed tuning of neurons in area MT.

Authors:  Anja Schlack; Bart Krekelberg; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Multi-level visual adaptation: dissociating curvature and facial-expression aftereffects produced by the same adapting stimuli.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Pan Liu; Peter Dayan; Ning Qian
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Fast odor learning improves reliability of odor responses in the locust antennal lobe.

Authors:  Maxim Bazhenov; Mark Stopfer; Terrence J Sejnowski; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Benucci; Aman B Saleem; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  81 in total

1.  Adaptation-induced modification of motion selectivity tuning in visual tectal neurons of adult zebrafish.

Authors:  Vanessa Hollmann; Valerie Lucks; Rafael Kurtz; Jacob Engelmann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Repetition suppression for visual actions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Pradeep Kuravi; Vittorio Caggiano; Martin Giese; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  fMRI evidence of aberrant neural adaptation for objects in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Junghee Lee; Eric A Reavis; Stephen A Engel; Lori L Altshuler; Mark S Cohen; David C Glahn; Keith H Nuechterlein; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Task-dependent recurrent dynamics in visual cortex.

Authors:  Satohiro Tajima; Kowa Koida; Chihiro I Tajima; Hideyuki Suzuki; Kazuyuki Aihara; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Elena Azañón; Matthew Danvers; Giuseppe Vallar; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.

Authors:  Amir Aschner; Samuel G Solomon; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Divisive Normalization Predicts Adaptation-Induced Response Changes in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Dzmitry A Kaliukhovich; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory and tactile frequency representations are co-embedded in modality-defined cortical sensory systems.

Authors:  Md Shoaibur Rahman; Kelly Anne Barnes; Lexi E Crommett; Mark Tommerdahl; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Is the straddle effect in contrast perception limited to second-order spatial vision?

Authors:  Norma V Graham; S Sabina Wolfson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.