Literature DB >> 12395112

Sound-induced illusory flash perception: role of gamma band responses.

Joydeep Bhattacharya1, Ladan Shams, Shinsuke Shimojo.   

Abstract

In the recently discovered sound-induced illusory flash phenomenon, a single flash accompanied with two auditory beeps is perceived as two flashes in a majority of trials. Here we asked what the neural substrates distinguishing illusion and no-illusion (i.e. perception of single flash) percepts are under identical stimulus configuration. Wavelet based method was used to analyze gamma band (> 30 Hz) responses in the event-related potential (ERP) signals recorded over visual cortical regions. We found: (i) significantly higher oscillatory and induced gamma band responses in illusion than in no-illusion trials, and (ii) significant supra-additive audio-visual interactions only in illusion trials. These results provide a clear neurophysiological correlate to the perception of illusion. Furthermore, the results suggest that auditory stimuli modulate cortical processing of visual stimuli, and the flash illusion (qualitative alteration of visual percept) only takes place when this modulation exceeds some critical threshold for the registration of conscious awareness. Copyright 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395112     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200210070-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  24 in total

1.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The sound-induced phosphene illusion.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Silvia Convento; Martina Fusaro; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Audiovisual temporal capture underlies flash fusion.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: effects of phase and stimulus-onset asynchrony.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Multisensory temporal function and EEG complexity in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic events.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; LeAnne Kurela; Sarah H Baum; Hong Yu; Joseph S Neimat; Martin J Gallagher; Mark Wallace
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.937

6.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory activity: analyzing non-linear electrophysiological measures in humans and simians.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Peter Lakatos; Glenn R Wylie; Sophie Molholm; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Nothing is irrelevant in a noisy world: sensory illusions reveal obligatory within-and across-modality integration.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Parietal connectivity mediates multisensory facilitation.

Authors:  David Brang; Zachary J Taich; Steven A Hillyard; Marcia Grabowecky; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Investigating neuromagnetic brain responses against chromatic flickering stimuli by wavelet entropies.

Authors:  Mayank Bhagat; Chitresh Bhushan; Goutam Saha; Shinsuke Shimjo; Katsumi Watanabe; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The impact of spatial incongruence on an auditory-visual illusion.

Authors:  Hamish Innes-Brown; David Crewther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.