Literature DB >> 24961249

Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Daniel P Kumpik1, Helen E Roberts1, Andrew J King1, Jennifer K Bizley2.   

Abstract

The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a multisensory perceptual phenomenon in which the number of brief visual stimuli perceived by an observer is influenced by the number of concurrently presented sounds. While the strength of this illusion has been shown to be modulated by the temporal congruence of the stimuli from each modality, there is conflicting evidence regarding its dependence upon their spatial congruence. We addressed this question by examining SIFIs under conditions in which the spatial reliability of the visual stimuli was degraded and different sound localization cues were presented using either free-field or closed-field stimulation. The likelihood of reporting a SIFI varied with the spatial cue composition of the auditory stimulus and was highest when binaural cues were presented over headphones. SIFIs were more common for small flashes than for large flashes, and for small flashes at peripheral locations, subjects experienced a greater number of illusory fusion events than fission events. However, the SIFI was not dependent on the spatial proximity of the audiovisual stimuli, but was instead determined primarily by differences in subjects' underlying sensitivity across the visual field to the number of flashes presented. Our findings indicate that the influence of auditory stimulation on visual numerosity judgments can occur independently of the spatial relationship between the stimuli.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory-visual interactions; signal detection theory; sound localization; sound-induced flash illusion; visual sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24961249      PMCID: PMC4070624          DOI: 10.1167/14.7.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  35 in total

1.  Illusions. What you see is what you hear.

Authors:  L Shams; Y Kamitani; S Shimojo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sound alters visual evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  L Shams; Y Kamitani; S Thompson; S Shimojo
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Brighter noise: sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Combining visual and auditory information.

Authors:  David Burr; David Alais
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Flash illusions induced by visual, auditory, and audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; David Alais; Lars T Boenke
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance.

Authors:  P Bertelson; M Radeau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

7.  Twice upon a time: multiple concurrent temporal recalibrations of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Warrick Roseboom; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-06-20

8.  Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki; Ansgar Koene; Derek Arnold; Alan Johnston; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  No effect of auditory-visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

1.  Long-term training reduces the responses to the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Erlei Wang; Ke Lu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity.

Authors:  Niall Gavin; Rebecca J Hirst; David P McGovern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Does hearing aid use affect audiovisual integration in mild hearing impairment?

Authors:  Anja Gieseler; Maike A S Tahden; Christiane M Thiel; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grouping by feature of cross-modal flankers in temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Michaela Klimova; Shin'ya Nishida; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Re-weighting of Sound Localization Cues by Audiovisual Training.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Connor Campbell; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Age-related sensory decline mediates the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion: Evidence for reliability weighting models of multisensory perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J Hirst; Annalisa Setti; Rose A Kenny; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Defining Auditory-Visual Objects: Behavioral Tests and Physiological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Ross K Maddox; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 8.  Audiovisual Temporal Perception in Aging: The Role of Multisensory Integration and Age-Related Sensory Loss.

Authors:  Cassandra J Brooks; Yu Man Chan; Andrew J Anderson; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Effects of Repetition Suppression on Sound Induced Flash Illusion With Aging.

Authors:  Yawen Sun; Xiaole Liu; Biqin Li; Clara Sava-Segal; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.