Literature DB >> 15460919

Brighter noise: sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation.

Eric C Odgaard1, Yoav Arieh, Lawrence E Marks.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effect of concurrently presented light on the perceived loudness of a low-level burst of white noise. The results suggest two points. First, white noise presented with light tends to be rated as louder than noise presented alone. Second, the enhancement in loudness judgments is resistant to two experimental manipulations: varying the probability that light accompanies sound and shifting from a rating method to a forced choice comparison. Both manipulations were previously shown to eliminate a complementary noise-induced enhancement in ratings of brightness. Whereas noise-induced enhancement of brightness seems to reflect a late-stage decisional process, such as a response bias, the present results suggest that light-induced enhancement of loudness may reflect an early-stage sensory interaction.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15460919     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  15 in total

Review 1.  On the neuronal basis for multisensory convergence: a brief overview.

Authors:  M Alex Meredith
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

2.  Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud Falchier; Simon Clavagnier; Pascal Barone; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural correlates of cross-modal binding.

Authors:  Khalafalla O Bushara; Takashi Hanakawa; Ilka Immisch; Keiichiro Toma; Kenji Kansaku; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: sensory interaction versus response bias.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs. Thomas (1941) revisited.

Authors:  M Radeau; P Bertelson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1987

7.  Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The effects of stimulus sequence and probability on perceptual processing.

Authors:  R S Hansen; A D Well
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-02

9.  The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses.

Authors:  D H Warren; R B Welch; T J McCarthy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

10.  An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection.

Authors:  Christopher T Lovelace; Barry E Stein; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07
View more
  19 in total

1.  Crossmodal propagation of sensory-evoked and spontaneous activity in the rat neocortex.

Authors:  Kentaroh Takagaki; Chuan Zhang; Jian-Young Wu; Michael Thomas Lippert
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A visual or tactile signal makes auditory speech detection more efficient by reducing uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Ewen Chao; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Binaural loudness summation for speech presented via earphones and loudspeaker with and without visual cues.

Authors:  Michael Epstein; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Nothing is irrelevant in a noisy world: sensory illusions reveal obligatory within-and across-modality integration.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki; Ansgar Koene; Derek Arnold; Alan Johnston; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dynamic characteristics of multisensory facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  W Y Wang; L Hu; E Valentini; X B Xie; H Y Cui; Y Hu
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Helen E Roberts; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.