Literature DB >> 23008021

Do obesity and/or stripe wear increase ceramic liner fracture risk? An XFEM analysis.

Jacob M Elkins1, Douglas R Pedersen, John J Callaghan, Thomas D Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypothesized risk factors for fracture of ceramic liners include impingement, edge-loading, and cup malpositioning. These risk factors are similar to those for generation of stripe wear. However, it is unclear whether the biomechanical conditions contributing to stripe wear generation also increase the risk for ceramic liner fracture QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) head stripe wear propensity; and (2) cup orientation would correlate with alumina liner fracture risk for instances of normal and elevated body weight.
METHODS: An eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) model was developed to investigate these mechanisms. Liner fracture risk for 36-mm alumina bearings was studied by simulating two fracture-prone motions: stooping and squatting. Twenty-five distinct cup orientations were considered with variants of both acetabular inclination and anteversion. Four separate body mass indices were considered: normal (25 kg/m(2)) and three levels of obesity (33, 42, and 50 kg/m(2)). Material properties were modified to simulate alumina with and without the presence of dispersed microflaws. The model was validated by corroboration with two previously published ceramic liner fracture studies.
RESULTS: Of 200 XFEM simulations with flaw-free alumina, fracture occurred in eight instances, all of them involving obesity. Each of these occurred with cups in ≤ 37° inclination and in 0° anteversion. For 200 corresponding simulations with microflawed alumina, fracture propensity was greatest for cups with higher (edge loading-associated) scraping wear. Fracture risk was greatest for cups with lower inclination (average 42° for fractured cases versus 48° for nonfractured cases) and lower anteversion (9° versus 20°).
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture propensity for 36-mm liners was elevated for cups with decreased anteversion and/or inclination and under conditions of patient obesity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Factors causing stripe wear, including obesity and cup malpositioning, also involve increased risk of ceramic liner fracture and merit heightened concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23008021      PMCID: PMC3549159          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2562-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation.

Authors:  Mark E Nadzadi; Douglas R Pedersen; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Mechanical performance of ceramic acetabular liners under impact conditions.

Authors:  Suzanne A Maher; Joseph D Lipman; Luke J Curley; Michael Gilchrist; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Ceramic acetabular liner fracture in total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic sandwich cup.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Akihiro Sudo; Hitoshi Hirata; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

5.  Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment.

Authors:  F Pierchon; G Pasquier; A Cotten; C Fontaine; J Clarisse; A Duquennoy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-01

Review 6.  Ceramics in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Didier Hannouche; Moussa Hamadouche; Rémy Nizard; Pascal Bizot; Alain Meunier; Laurent Sedel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Sung-Kwan Hwang; Won-Sik Choy; Yong-Sik Kim; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip systems in the United States: early results.

Authors:  J P Garino
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Severe wear and fracture of zirconia heads against alumina inserts in hip simulator studies with microseparation.

Authors:  Todd D Stewart; Joanne L Tipper; Gerard Insley; Robert M Streicher; Eileen Ingham; John Fisher
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: stripe wear.

Authors:  William L Walter; Gerard M Insley; William K Walter; Michael A Tuke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

1.  Catastrophic ceramic liner failure-The subtle signs of a non-engaged ceramic liner.

Authors:  Andrew Walls; Adam Tucker; David S Warnock; David Beverland
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20

2.  Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Grégory Kern; Ronald Isida; Julien Girard; Nassima Ramdane; Christian P Delaunay; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Ceramic head fracture in ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae-Hwi Nho; Jong-Seok Park; Ui-Seoub Song; Woo-Jong Kim; You-Sung Suh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Mid term results of total hip arthroplasty using polyethylene-ceramic composite (Sandwich) liner.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Jun-Ying Sun; Guo-Chun Zha; Sheng-Jie Dong; Xi-Jiang Zhao
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.