Literature DB >> 23001161

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Liang Lv1, Yong-Fang Shao, Yan-bing Zhou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to produce a comprehensive, up-to-date meta-analysis exploring the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery programs after colorectal resection.
METHOD: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were performed for relevant studies published between January 1966 and April 2012. All randomized controlled trials on fast track (FT) colorectal surgery were reviewed systematically. The main end points were short-term morbidity, length of primary postoperative hospital stay, length of total postoperative stay, readmission rate, and mortality.
RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials with 852 patients were included. The total length of hospital stay [mean difference (95 % confidence interval), -1.88 (-2.91, -0.86), p = 0.0003] and total complication rates [relative risk (95 % confidence interval), 0.69 (0.51, 0.93), p = 0.01] were significantly reduced in the enhanced recovery group. There was no statistically significant difference in readmission (risk ratio (RR) 0.90; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 1.53, p = 0.69) and mortality rates (RR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.40 to 2.57, p = 0.97).
CONCLUSION: Results suggested that enhanced recovery after surgery pathways can be able to reduce the length of stay and complication rates after major colorectal surgery without compromising patient safety. Future studies have to define the active elements in order to improve future fast track protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001161     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1577-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  22 in total

1.  "Ideal" length of stay after colectomy: whose ideal?

Authors:  D J Schoetz; M Bockler; M S Rosenblatt; S Malhotra; P L Roberts; J J Murray; J A Coller; L C Rusin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Lesley Wood; Matthias Egger; Lise Lotte Gluud; Kenneth F Schulz; Peter Jüni; Douglas G Altman; Christian Gluud; Richard M Martin; Anthony J G Wood; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-03

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C J Walter; J Collin; J C Dumville; P J Drew; J R Monson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery.

Authors:  B G Bradshaw; S S Liu; R C Thirlby
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Authors:  D Moher; B Pham; A Jones; D J Cook; A R Jadad; M Moher; P Tugwell; T P Klassen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study).

Authors:  Malaika S Vlug; Jan Wind; Markus W Hollmann; Dirk T Ubbink; Huib A Cense; Alexander F Engel; Michael F Gerhards; Bart A van Wagensveld; Edwin S van der Zaag; Anna A W van Geloven; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Miguel A Cuesta; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Massarat Zutshi; Anthony J Senagore; Feza H Remzi; Jeffrey Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; S M Cohen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care.

Authors:  A D G Anderson; C E McNaught; J MacFie; I Tring; P Barker; C J Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  54 in total

1.  Reliability of Continuous Non-Invasive Assessment of Hemoglobin and Fluid Responsiveness: Impact of Obesity and Abdominal Insufflation Pressures.

Authors:  Mia DeBarros; Marlin W Causey; Patrick Chesley; Matthew Martin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The earlier the better?

Authors:  Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for open hepatectomy--physiology, immunomodulation, and implementation.

Authors:  Andrew J Page; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Tiffany Zavadsky; Michael C Grant; Daniel J Galante; Elizabeth C Wick; Matthew Weiss; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wu; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Evolution and future of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Outcomes After Bowel Resection for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Surgical Care Bundles and Enhanced Recovery.

Authors:  Anthony P D'Andrea; Prerna Khetan; Reba Miller; Patricia Sylla; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients.

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Ugo Elmore; Giovanni Guarneri; Valentino De Ruvo; Paolo Parise; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-07-08

9.  ERAS protocol validation in a propensity-matched cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Aaron C Spaulding; James M Naessens; Zhuo Li; Amit Merchea; Julia E Crook; David W Larson; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Does Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Colorectal Surgery Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Kristen A Ban; Julia R Berian; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.