Literature DB >> 14648727

Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care.

A D G Anderson1, C E McNaught, J MacFie, I Tring, P Barker, C J Mitchell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multimodal optimization of surgical care has been associated with reduced hospital stay and improved physical function. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare multimodal optimization with standard care in patients undergoing colonic resection.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients requiring elective right or left hemicolectomy were randomized to receive a ten-point optimization programme (14 patients) or conventional care (11). The groups were similar in terms of age (64 versus 68 years), male : female sex ratio (6 : 8 versus 5 : 6) and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) score (both 26). Outcome measures were recorded before operation and on postoperative days 1, 7 and 30. They included hand grip strength, lung spirometry, and pain and fatigue scores. Further outcome measures included time to achieve a predetermined mobilization target, time to resumption of normal diet, and length of stay.
RESULTS: Optimization was associated with maintained grip strength, earlier mobilization (46 versus 69 h; P = 0.043), and significantly lower pain and fatigue scores. Patients in the optimization group tolerated a regular hospital diet significantly earlier than controls (48 versus 76 h; P < 0.001). Optimization significantly reduced the median length of hospital stay (3 versus 7 days; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Optimization of surgical care significantly improved patients' physical and psychological function in the early postoperative period and facilitated early hospital discharge. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648727     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  88 in total

1.  Feasibility of enhanced recovery programme in various patient groups.

Authors:  Paul M Verheijen; Anthony W H Vd Ven; Paul H P Davids; Bryan J M Vd Wall; Apollo Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Amy Glicksman; Emily Pearsall; J Charles Victor; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted and open high anterior resection within an ERAS protocol.

Authors:  Ulf O Gustafsson; Marit Tiefenthal; Anders Thorell; Olle Ljungqvist; Jonas Nygrens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Fast-track for the modern colorectal department.

Authors:  Rishabh Sehgal; Arnold Hill; Joseph Deasy; Deborah A McNamara; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Reducing preoperative fasting time: A trend based on evidence.

Authors:  José Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento; Diana Borges Dock-Nascimento
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-27

7.  Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; José Manuel Ramirez; Daniel Callejo; Xavier Viñas; Sergio Maeso; Roger Cabezali; Elena Miranda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery Reduced Postoperative Pain and Unplanned Returns to Care After Discharge.

Authors:  Aaron B Parrish; Sean M O'Neill; Steven R Crain; Tara A Russell; Deepak K Sonthalia; Vu T Nguyen; Armen Aboulian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  ERAS protocol validation in a propensity-matched cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Aaron C Spaulding; James M Naessens; Zhuo Li; Amit Merchea; Julia E Crook; David W Larson; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Anastomotic Location Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After Elective Colonic Resection for Cancer.

Authors:  Thibault Voron; Matthieu Bruzzi; Emilia Ragot; Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Richard Douard; Anne Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.