Literature DB >> 32638264

Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients.

Andrea Vignali1,2, Ugo Elmore3, Giovanni Guarneri3, Valentino De Ruvo3, Paolo Parise3, Riccardo Rosati3,4.   

Abstract

To identify factors associated with early deviation and delayed discharge within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery and managed with a standardized ERAS pathway between April 2015 and October 2018. ERAS items were assessed within 48 h after surgery. Patients with early complications were excluded. The influence of factors on length of stay was calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to model a predicting score. Seven hundred and thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years (P = 0.02), ASA score ≥ 3 (P = 0.03), open surgery or conversion to open (P = 0.001), non-compliance with the intra-operative balanced fluid therapy (P = 0.049), failure to early removal of the urinary catheter (P = 0.001), to discontinue IV fluid (P = 0.02) and to early mobilization (P = 0.001) were independently associated with ERAS failure. The generated score had a specificity of 84% and a positive predictive value of 72%. Patients who would have a length of stay longer than the median for each surgical procedure were properly identified (Area under ROC Curve = 0.753, P < 0.001). The delayed discharge could be predicted at 48 h from the intervention. The ability of the model to weight the specific role of each statistically significant variable might be a useful tool to identify the most frail patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Colon; ERAS; Laparoscopy; Rectum; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32638264     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00848-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  32 in total

1.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway vs traditional care in laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center experience.

Authors:  A Vignali; U Elmore; A Cossu; M Lemma; B Calì; P de Nardi; R Rosati
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation.

Authors:  L Bardram; P Funch-Jensen; P Jensen; M E Crawford; H Kehlet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Krishna K Varadhan; Keith R Neal; Cornelius H C Dejong; Kenneth C H Fearon; Olle Ljungqvist; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.324

7.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Anil K Hemandas; Tarig Abdelrahman; Karen G Flashman; Angela J Skull; Asha Senapati; Daniel P O'Leary; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Eight years of experience with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in patients with colon cancer: Impact of measures to improve adherence.

Authors:  Nathalie Bakker; Hamit Cakir; H J Doodeman; A P J Houdijk
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ulf O Gustafsson; Jonatan Hausel; Anders Thorell; Olle Ljungqvist; Mattias Soop; Jonas Nygren
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-01-17

10.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liang Lv; Yong-Fang Shao; Yan-bing Zhou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  ERAS pathway for gastric cancer surgery: adherence, outcomes and prognostic factors for compliance in a Western centre.

Authors:  Pietro Maria Lombardi; Michele Mazzola; Alessandro Giani; Sara Baleri; Marianna Maspero; Paolo De Martini; Monica Gualtierotti; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-20

2.  ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Michele Manigrasso; Monica Ortenzi; Emanuele Botteri; Alberto Arezzo; Gianfranco Silecchia; Mario Guerrieri; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Ferdinando Agresta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.